“…On the other hand, in the occipital region, we found significant main effects of the ease of picture-naming in channels 13, 15, 20, 21, and 24 (F(1, 13) = 6.00, p < 0.05; F(1, 13) = 6.37, p < 0.05; F(1, 13) = 5.99, p < 0.05; F(1, 13) = 4.87, p < 0.05; F(1, 13) = 9.63, p < 0.01, respectively), and significant interactions between the picture-naming condition and period in channels 13,15,16,20,22,23, and 24 (F(10, 130) = 2.09, p < 0.05; F(10, 130) = 2.25, p < 0.05; F(10, 130) = 2.34, p < 0.05; F(10, 130) = 2.00, p < 0.05; F(10, 130) = 2.07, p < 0.05; F(10, 130) = 3.00, p < 0.01; F(10, 130) = 3.46, p < 0.01, respectively). Post-hoc comparisons using Shaffer's modified Bonferroni correction revealed that these interactions were due to the large responses under the easy condition as compared to those under the difficult condition during the period from target-presentation to confidence-judgment (p < 0.05).…”