2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls on event runoff coefficients in the eastern Italian Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
158
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
158
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This distribution likely reflects the variability of the storms analyzed, mostly in terms of total precipitation, storm duration, rainfall intensity and antecedent wetness conditions. The mean value (0.15) was noticeably lower than that found by Norbiato et al (2009) different calculation method, this was likely due to a different selection of runoff events. Investigations are on going to identify scale dependency in the different distributions of runoff coefficients.…”
Section: Event Runoff Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This distribution likely reflects the variability of the storms analyzed, mostly in terms of total precipitation, storm duration, rainfall intensity and antecedent wetness conditions. The mean value (0.15) was noticeably lower than that found by Norbiato et al (2009) different calculation method, this was likely due to a different selection of runoff events. Investigations are on going to identify scale dependency in the different distributions of runoff coefficients.…”
Section: Event Runoff Coefficientscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The results verified that the runoff coefficients were highly variable as expected, but none of them exceeded 0.75. Norbiato et al (2009) came to the same conclusions for several catchments at the southern edge of the Alps. In addition, Merz et al (2006) showed that runoff coefficients larger than 0.8 only apply when snowmelt processes are involved.…”
Section: Determination Of the Runoff Coefficients An Approach For Thesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…5 it is clear that, as the catchment becomes wet, the hydrological response increases and, consequently, it represents a greater percentage of rainfall. Probably the antecedent soil moisture state plays an important role in the hydrological response of the catchment, as has been often suggested for temperate humid catchments (Dunne et al 1975, Pfister et al 2002, Norbiato et al 2009, Penna et al 2011. However, over the study period, the observed seasonality of the runoff coefficients was also possibly affected by rainfall characteristics, such as large and long rainfall events occurring in 2006.…”
Section: Hydrological Response At the Event Scalementioning
confidence: 67%