2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls on the magmatic fraction of extension at mid-ocean ridges

Abstract: Highlights Magmatic component of seafloor spreading (M) increases non-linearly with spreading rate. Stress interactions between fault slip events and magma intrusions provide physical basis for M. Axial lithosphere thickness and rate of pressure build-up in sills are primary controls on M. Transitions between modes of seafloor spreading reflect thresholds in axial lithosphere thickness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the eruption interval of 18 years is uniform across all three segments, then 50%–75% of plate spreading would need to be accommodated by faulting at segments 4–5 and 6–7 in order to make up for the inferred deficit in spreading accommodated by dike intrusion. Although such a high degree of fault‐accommodated spreading is unlikely in such a high magma‐supply and spreading rate ridge segment (e.g., Buck et al., 2005; Olive & Dublanchet, 2020), faulting may play a role when considered over multiple eruptive cycles, although earthquake data to test this idea are not yet available. A more likely explanation is that over longer time scales than the ∼30 years of observations at the EPR 9°50′N system, magmatic events occur episodically (i.e., at irregular time intervals), and that magmatic episode time interval varies between segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the eruption interval of 18 years is uniform across all three segments, then 50%–75% of plate spreading would need to be accommodated by faulting at segments 4–5 and 6–7 in order to make up for the inferred deficit in spreading accommodated by dike intrusion. Although such a high degree of fault‐accommodated spreading is unlikely in such a high magma‐supply and spreading rate ridge segment (e.g., Buck et al., 2005; Olive & Dublanchet, 2020), faulting may play a role when considered over multiple eruptive cycles, although earthquake data to test this idea are not yet available. A more likely explanation is that over longer time scales than the ∼30 years of observations at the EPR 9°50′N system, magmatic events occur episodically (i.e., at irregular time intervals), and that magmatic episode time interval varies between segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the OSC, <23% of the extension is clearly shown to be accommodated by magmatic intrusion (along the SRZ). This indicate that the OSC is 2-3 times more tectonic-accommodated extension than expected based on the longer timescale average suggested by the ratio of magmatic extension (M) at intermediate-spreading rate ridges which ranges from 0.7 to 0.95 Olive & Dublanchet, 2020). Such variations likely result from temporal variations in volcanic and tectonic activity and therefore in the underlying plumbing system.…”
Section: Asymmetry Of the Extension And Short-term Extension Ratementioning
confidence: 72%
“…The resulting seafloor morphology is the so-called smooth seafloor 4 , with extensive exposure of mantle-derived peridotites and only patches of hummocky basalts 2 . This newly-discovered seafloor spreading mode differs from the "classic" detachment-volcanic and volcanicvolcanic modes at slow spreading ridges and at more magmatically-robust portions of ultraslow spreading ridges, where at least one plate is dominated by abyssal-hill volcanic seafloor [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%