2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convalescent plasma therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients: Efficacy and risk of thromboembolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant differences in the rate of thromboembolic episodes were recorded between cases and controls, both in the overall analysis and in the analysis restricted to FFP controls. These data, which are in accordance with recent findings by Li and colleagues, 56 are not trivial considering the prothrombotic context of COVID-19 57 and early concerns that CCP could trigger coagulation-related adverse effects. 58 Notably, all thromboembolic events occurring during the study periods were reported in this systematic review, not necessarily only those treatment-related, which it was not possible to extract separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No significant differences in the rate of thromboembolic episodes were recorded between cases and controls, both in the overall analysis and in the analysis restricted to FFP controls. These data, which are in accordance with recent findings by Li and colleagues, 56 are not trivial considering the prothrombotic context of COVID-19 57 and early concerns that CCP could trigger coagulation-related adverse effects. 58 Notably, all thromboembolic events occurring during the study periods were reported in this systematic review, not necessarily only those treatment-related, which it was not possible to extract separately.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%