2022
DOI: 10.1002/met.2055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convective‐scale numerical weather prediction and warnings over Lake Victoria: Part II—Can model output support severe weather warning decision‐making?

Abstract: The greater Lake Victoria region was the focus of the ‘HIGHWeather impact lAke sYstem’ project, with the aim of developing an early warning capability for hazardous weather. Strong thunderstorm outflows can cause boats to capsize and lead to drowning. Lightning is also a hazard to fishermen, and over land flash flooding from heavy rainfall is a significant hazard. Between March and October 2019, 16 regional warnings were issued, and 14 days had reported impacts. Only one of the issued warnings aligned with any… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contingency tables have been used in various meteorological studies (Ihara et al, 2007;Fowler et al, 2010;Maldonado et al, 2013;Mittermaier et al, 2022). Therefore, as an initial approach, this method was used to examine individual stations' data with respect to changes in the general distribution of daily rainfall intensity.…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingency tables have been used in various meteorological studies (Ihara et al, 2007;Fowler et al, 2010;Maldonado et al, 2013;Mittermaier et al, 2022). Therefore, as an initial approach, this method was used to examine individual stations' data with respect to changes in the general distribution of daily rainfall intensity.…”
Section: Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the forecasts initialized at 18 UTC were evaluated. The full forecast is 54 h long, but in line with part 2 of this study, the verification is focused on the definition of 'Day 1', which spans the 24 h period between 06 and 06 UTC, in line with the issuance of warnings (see companion paper Mittermaier et al, 2021), covered by forecast ranges of t + 13 h to t + 36 h. Forecasts were considered in two ways: hourly fields and as a 'maximum-in-the-day' field, extracting the maximum number of lightning flashes in each grid box within a 24-h period from the 24 underpinning hourly fields.…”
Section: Lightning Diagnostic Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated earlier, the forecast itself is 54 h in length, initialized at 18 UTC, thus covering two full days. HIGHWAY and part 2 of this paper (see Mittermaier et al, 2021) are primarily interested in the lead times between t + 13 h and t + 36 h. This is the period that corresponds with the warnings that are issued, which are valid for 24 h from 06 UTC to 06 UTC. Although the focus of the verification statistics is also for the t + 13 h to t + 36 h period, it is interesting to see how the model behaves before and after this time to understand aspects of forecast conservation, for example.…”
Section: Comparing the Diurnal Cycle Of Lightning Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations