Convergence on inflation and divergence on price control among post Keynesian pioneers: insights from Galbraith and Lerner

Abstract

This article proposes a historical and analytical reconstruction of a debate that never happened between John Kenneth Galbraith and Abba Lerner over the issue of price controls. While they adopted a similar analysis of underemployment inflation, shared by many post Keynesians, Lerner and Galbraith remained fundamentally opposed as to the effectiveness of price controls. Indeed, while both agreed on the relevance of price controls in the specific context of World War II, they disagreed over including price controls within the conventional framework of economic policies, as illustrated by their respective stances in the debate surrounding the stagflation of the 1970s. Throughout the paper, we provide the rationales behind their divergence on price controls by investigating its theoretical, epistemological, and normative roots. Finally, we put into perspective the contemporary debates about price control in the context of resurgent inflationary pressures with some salient points drawn from our reconstruction of the debate that opposed these two pioneering post Keynesians economists.

Inflation Theory: A Theoretical Review of Demand-Pull and Cost-Push Inflation Effect on Nigeria Economy

“…Nugraha et al ( 2023) establish that Cost-push inflation is due to the shift of the aggregate supply curve towards the upper left. The factors that cause the aggregate supply curve to shift, according to Chirat and Clerc (2023), are the increasing prices of production factors (both domestic and foreign) in the production factor market, thus causing an increase in commodity prices in the commodity market. The cost-push inflation causes price increases which will often be followed by business lethargy.…”

Planning Beyond Growth the Case for Economic Democracy within Ecological Limits

“…There is a long tradition of ecological planning in geography and environmental management studies (Ndubisi, 2002;Steiner and Brooks, 1981), with recent contributions in industrial engineering (Denkena et al, 2022) that analyze planning from a functionalist perspective focusing on the administrative branch or the industrial process. Moreover, economic planning has long been an important topic in both economics and socialist literature and is today seeing a revival as a postcapitalist project (Phillips and Rozworski, 2019;Vettese and Pendergrass, 2022;Harnecker and Bartolome, 2019;Saros, 2014;Sorg, 2022) and with a renewed academic interest in industrial policy and price control (Weber et al, 2022;Chirat and Clerc, 2023;Riofrancos et al, 2023;Chang and Andreoni, 2020). So far, most of these planning debatesincluding the newly emerging strands integrating digitalization and platform toolshave largely lacked a substantial engagement with the question of growth/degrowth and limits in general (Cockshott et al, 2022;Hahnel, 2021;Tremblay-Pepin, 2022).…”