1957
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1028989001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence properties of sequences of linear fractional transformations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that if a sequence of Möbius maps converges at three distinct points to three distinct values, then it converges uniformly on C ∞ to a Möbius map [18]. We sketch a proof of this fact that is reminiscent of standard proofs of Vitali's theorem using a normal families argument.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is known that if a sequence of Möbius maps converges at three distinct points to three distinct values, then it converges uniformly on C ∞ to a Möbius map [18]. We sketch a proof of this fact that is reminiscent of standard proofs of Vitali's theorem using a normal families argument.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The set of divergence of S n is the set of points z in C ∞ for which the sequence S n (z) diverges. Sets of divergence for general sequences of Möbius transformations have been studied in [5,6,14]. The set of divergence is closely related to the limit set from Kleinian group theory and the Julia set from complex dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] George Piranian and Wolfgang Thron defined a class of subsets of the Riemann sphere C ∞ , which they called sets of divergence. A set A ⊆ C ∞ is a set of divergence if and only if there exists a sequence (G n ) of Möbius transformations such that the sequence (G n (z)) diverges for each z ∈ A and converges for each z ∈ A. Paul Erdős and Piranian continued the study of these sets in [9], giving a geometric characterisation of the countable sets of divergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1.1 enables us to give purely geometric proofs of the known results about sets of divergence, and also some new results about these sets, without reference to explicit sequences of Möbius maps. Most of the proofs of [9,11] involve explicit sequences of Möbius transformations, hence these proofs are valid only in two-dimensions. In contrast, our geometric proofs are valid in all dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%