2012
DOI: 10.1080/17442508.2011.653568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence results for the indifference value based on the stability of BSDEs

Abstract: We study the exponential utility indifference value h for a contingent claim H in an incomplete market driven by two Brownian motions. The claim H depends on a nontradable asset variably correlated with the traded asset available for hedging. We provide an explicit sequence that converges to h, complementing the structural results for h known from the literature. Our study is based on a convergence result for quadratic backward stochastic differential equations. This convergence result, which we prove in a gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B M O 1 (P) ≤ Xπ ,1 B M O 1 (P), we obtain from the variant of the John-Nirenberg inequality stated in Theorem 2.1 of Kazamaki[13] that EP exp qpη 2 λ 2 Xπ that there exists p > 1 such that E( (η 2 Z (k) + θ) dŴ ) satisfies the reverse Hölder inequality R p (P) uniformly in k; compare (3.2). This implies by Theorem 3.3 of Kazamaki[13] that the B M O(P)-norm of Z (k) dŴ is bounded uniformly in k. One can now show similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.1 of Frei[9] that one has lim k→∞ Y (Y (∞) , Z (∞) ) is the solution of the BSDE related to Vπ 2 . Therefore, we obtain lim k→∞ Vπ k 2 = − lim k→∞ exp(η 2 Y = Vπ 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…B M O 1 (P) ≤ Xπ ,1 B M O 1 (P), we obtain from the variant of the John-Nirenberg inequality stated in Theorem 2.1 of Kazamaki[13] that EP exp qpη 2 λ 2 Xπ that there exists p > 1 such that E( (η 2 Z (k) + θ) dŴ ) satisfies the reverse Hölder inequality R p (P) uniformly in k; compare (3.2). This implies by Theorem 3.3 of Kazamaki[13] that the B M O(P)-norm of Z (k) dŴ is bounded uniformly in k. One can now show similarly to the proof of Theorem 2.1 of Frei[9] that one has lim k→∞ Y (Y (∞) , Z (∞) ) is the solution of the BSDE related to Vπ 2 . Therefore, we obtain lim k→∞ Vπ k 2 = − lim k→∞ exp(η 2 Y = Vπ 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…An approach similar to ours was used in [12] for the exponential indifference value when the mean-variance tradeoff process is bounded. There one has λ n ≡ λ and β n · M ≡ L n ≡ 0 so that the quadratic growth and locally Lipschitz assumptions on the respective BSDEs are uniform in n so that a corresponding stability result can be used.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therein stability of the optimal payoff with respect to market variations is studied while a utility defined on R+ is fixed. This type of stability problem has recently been investigated in Frei () and Bayraktar and Kravitz () for the exponential utility maximization problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%