2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergently Emergent: Ecological and Enactive Approaches to the Texture of Agency

Abstract: Enactive and ecological approaches to cognitive science both claim a "mutuality" between agents and their environments-that they have a complementary nature and should be addressed as a single whole system. Despite this apparent agreement, each offers criticisms of the other on precisely this point-enactivists claiming that ecological psychologists overemphasize the environment, while the complementary criticism, of agent-centered constructivism, is leveled by ecological psychologists at enactivists. In this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in collecting, sampling and analysing data) or epistemological considerations (e.g. experience from within vs. experience as a symmetrical organism-environment system; for detailed discussion on this topic, see McGann, 2020). Many issues arise about the status (primacy) of different types of data (verbalisation vs. behavioural observations) and about the type of analysis (e.g.…”
Section: Epistemological and Methodological Cautions And Limitations ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in collecting, sampling and analysing data) or epistemological considerations (e.g. experience from within vs. experience as a symmetrical organism-environment system; for detailed discussion on this topic, see McGann, 2020). Many issues arise about the status (primacy) of different types of data (verbalisation vs. behavioural observations) and about the type of analysis (e.g.…”
Section: Epistemological and Methodological Cautions And Limitations ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of moving agency center stage is forcefully illustrated by enactivism (see Ward et al, 2017), which envisages a, broadly speaking, “constructive” relationship of agents to milieus and steers clear of blind spots discussed in section 2 (see debates between enactivists and ecological psychologist: Baggs & Chemero, 2018; Flament-Fultot et al, 2016; McGann, 2020). Following Varela et al (1991), enactivism stresses how the ecology constrains and informs living beings, yet also speaks of these beings as “bringing forth their world.” Enactivists define perception as involving sensorimotor enactment and accordingly emphasize that agents do not simply “respond to” or “resonate with” the ecology (Varela et al, 1991, p. 204).…”
Section: Perception Action and Creative Orientednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems not far removed from Reed’s (1996) way of understanding values. McGann (2020) also explores enactive ways of relating agency and values, some of which carry hints of aligning with ecological values-realizing.…”
Section: Divergences Convergences and New Possibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%