2020
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion Factor From Dosemeter Reading to Air Kerma for Nuclear Worker Using Anthropomorphic Phantom for Further Conversion From Air Kerma to Organ-Absorbed Dose

Abstract: Estimation of cancer risk based on the organ-absorbed dose is underway for the Japanese Epidemiological Study on Low-Dose Radiation Effects (J-EPISODE). The reconstruction method for the organ-absorbed dose follows the approach adopted in the IARC 15-Country Collaborative Study, which examined the dosemeter response to photon exposure for the old film badge (FB) type, a multi-element FB and a thermoluminescence dosemeter. Until 2000, the dosemeters used in Japan were almost the same in the IARC study, so IARC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias factor B 2 was defined as the dosimeter reading per air kerma by dosimeter type and nuclear facility type. Table 5 , “Dosemeter response and uncertainty by dosemeter type and nuclear facility type,” in Furuta et al (2020a) shows bias B 2 and uncertainty K 2 for GB, EPD, and LB, while Figure 6, “Dosimeter response per air kerma in the work environment experienced by nuclear workers by dosimeter type and nuclear facility type,” in Furuta et al (2020a) shows the B 2 for old FB, multi-element FB, and TLD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The bias factor B 2 was defined as the dosimeter reading per air kerma by dosimeter type and nuclear facility type. Table 5 , “Dosemeter response and uncertainty by dosemeter type and nuclear facility type,” in Furuta et al (2020a) shows bias B 2 and uncertainty K 2 for GB, EPD, and LB, while Figure 6, “Dosimeter response per air kerma in the work environment experienced by nuclear workers by dosimeter type and nuclear facility type,” in Furuta et al (2020a) shows the B 2 for old FB, multi-element FB, and TLD.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… a Note: (1) Dosimeter response B 2 and uncertainty K 2 for GB, EPD, and LB cited Table 5 of Furuta et al (2020a) . (2) Dosimeter response B 2 for old FB, multi-element FB, and TLD refers to Figure 6 in Furuta et al (2020a) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reflecting the above result of literature survey, conversion factor from dosemeter reading to air kerma for nuclear worker for further conversion from air kerma to organ-absorbed dose was constructed in the preceding paper of Furuta et al . (2020) ( 16 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%