2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-016-1979-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of tundra to exposed peat habitat by snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens) and Ross’s geese (C. rossii) in the central Canadian Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar landscape‐level changes induced by grubbing and grazing of graminoids by geese have been reported elsewhere. In the Queen Maud Gulf region, Canada, the proportion of exposed peat increased significantly with proximity to goose colonies (Conkin & Alisauskas, ) and the biomass of graminoids was 330 g/m 2 lower within colonies compared to outside (Samelius & Alisauskas, ). Over ~23 years, satellite imagery shows that the proportion of exposed substrate present in the Queen Maud Gulf region increased by 410%, which resulted in a ~32% decline in wet sedge meadow, particularly within the goose colony (Conkin & Alisauskas, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar landscape‐level changes induced by grubbing and grazing of graminoids by geese have been reported elsewhere. In the Queen Maud Gulf region, Canada, the proportion of exposed peat increased significantly with proximity to goose colonies (Conkin & Alisauskas, ) and the biomass of graminoids was 330 g/m 2 lower within colonies compared to outside (Samelius & Alisauskas, ). Over ~23 years, satellite imagery shows that the proportion of exposed substrate present in the Queen Maud Gulf region increased by 410%, which resulted in a ~32% decline in wet sedge meadow, particularly within the goose colony (Conkin & Alisauskas, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Queen Maud Gulf region, Canada, the proportion of exposed peat increased significantly with proximity to goose colonies (Conkin & Alisauskas, ) and the biomass of graminoids was 330 g/m 2 lower within colonies compared to outside (Samelius & Alisauskas, ). Over ~23 years, satellite imagery shows that the proportion of exposed substrate present in the Queen Maud Gulf region increased by 410%, which resulted in a ~32% decline in wet sedge meadow, particularly within the goose colony (Conkin & Alisauskas, ). In the Hudson Bay lowlands, goose‐altered areas have 29% more bare ground, 30% more moss and 32% less sedge cover than intact areas (Sammler et al., ), and grazing geese have reduced the proportions of sedge (−37%) and scrub habitat (−61%; Peterson, Rockwell, Witte, & Koons, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To isolate the effects of geese per se, we excluded from analysis any plots that were >200 km from the edge of a known goose colony. Previous site‐specific studies have found goose‐related effects on vegetation extend 17–19 km (Conkin and Alisauskas ; R. F. Rockwell et al., unpublished data ) from colonies, while effects on predators extend to 10.5 km from colonies (Lamarre et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the analyses, we examined patterns within this 200 km buffer in an attempt to locate a threshold distance for effects of geese (see Data analyses ). We acknowledge that pre‐ and post‐breeding light geese can have pronounced effects on habitat far outside the boundaries of the breeding colonies (Conkin and Alisauskas ). Thus, some of our plots outside of colonies were nevertheless within areas of altered habitat, weakening our ability to test our prediction and making our approach a conservative test of the effects of geese.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation