2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex hull indexed Gaussian mixture model (CH-GMM) for 3D point set registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Georgios et al [36] introduce a motion drift idea into the GMM framework and achieve good results on rigid and non-rigid point set registration. [37] extracts the convex hull and uses GMM to estimate the transformation matrix on these convex sets of a point set. [38] proposes a joint registration of a multiple point cloud (JR-MPC) solution to GMM-based approach by recasting registration as a clustering problem.…”
Section: Registration: Transformed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Georgios et al [36] introduce a motion drift idea into the GMM framework and achieve good results on rigid and non-rigid point set registration. [37] extracts the convex hull and uses GMM to estimate the transformation matrix on these convex sets of a point set. [38] proposes a joint registration of a multiple point cloud (JR-MPC) solution to GMM-based approach by recasting registration as a clustering problem.…”
Section: Registration: Transformed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] proposes a joint registration of a multiple point cloud (JR-MPC) solution to GMM-based approach by recasting registration as a clustering problem. In the previous GMM-based registration methods [36], [35], [37], they estimate one GMM using one point clouds or two GMMs using two point clouds. This makes the reasonable assumption that points from one set are normally distributed around points belonging to the other set.…”
Section: Registration: Transformed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization based deformable registration methods can be divided into two categories (Oliveira and Tavares, 2014; Sotiras et al, 2013): intensity-based (Johnson and Christensen, 2002; Klein et al, 2010; Myronenko and Song, 2010; Tang et al, 2018, 2019; Vercauteren et al, 2009) and feature-based (Auzias et al, 2011; Avants et al, 2008; Ou et al, 2011; Shen and Davatzikos, 2002; Wu et al, 2014, 2010). The deformable registration is often based on linear (rigid/affine) registration (Fan et al, 2016a,b 2017), where the linear registration intends to globally align the two images and the deformation registration is used to correct the local deformations. But unlike linear registration, deformable registration is an often ill-posed high-dimensional optimization problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the Expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm [26] is applied to estimate GMM parameters. Because of its powerful capability, GMM serves in several fields extensively, such as rigid and non-rigid point set registration [29,28,7], compressive sensing [50], speech recognition [34], model denoising [24], model reconstruction [35] and skeleton learning [22,23]. For instance, Preiner et al [35] proposed a hierarchical EM algorithm to quickly reduce the number of model points, preserving the utmost details.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%