2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-008-9076-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex Hulls of Orbits and Orientations of a Moving Protein Domain

Abstract: Abstract. We study the facial structure and Carathéodory number of the convex hull of an orbit of the group of rotations in R 3 acting on the space of pairs of anisotropic symmetric 3 × 3 tensors. This is motivated by the problem of determining the structure of some proteins in aqueous solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanyal et al raise the general question of whether conv SO(n) is a spectrahedron for all n (which we answer in the affirmative), and more broadly ask for a classification of the SO(n)-orbitopes that are spectrahedra. Earlier work on orbitopes in the context of convex geometry includes the work of Barvinok and Vershik [3] who consider orbitopes of finite groups in the context of combinatorial optimization, Barvinok and Blekherman [2], who used asymptotic volume computations to show that there are many more non-negative polynomials than sums of squares (among other things), and Longinetti et al [21] who studied SO(3)-orbitopes with a view to applications in protein structure determination. More recently Sinn [32] has studied in detail the algebraic boundary of four-dimensional SO(2)orbitopes as well as the Barvinok-Novik orbitopes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sanyal et al raise the general question of whether conv SO(n) is a spectrahedron for all n (which we answer in the affirmative), and more broadly ask for a classification of the SO(n)-orbitopes that are spectrahedra. Earlier work on orbitopes in the context of convex geometry includes the work of Barvinok and Vershik [3] who consider orbitopes of finite groups in the context of combinatorial optimization, Barvinok and Blekherman [2], who used asymptotic volume computations to show that there are many more non-negative polynomials than sums of squares (among other things), and Longinetti et al [21] who studied SO(3)-orbitopes with a view to applications in protein structure determination. More recently Sinn [32] has studied in detail the algebraic boundary of four-dimensional SO(2)orbitopes as well as the Barvinok-Novik orbitopes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some situations, especially those arising from physical problems, we require the additional constraint that the decision variables be in the set of rotation matrices SO(n) := {X ∈ R n×n : X T X = I, det(X) = 1} (2) representing Euclidean isometries that also preserve orientation. For example, these additional constraints arise in problems involving attitude estimation for spacecraft [25] or pose estimation in computer vision applications [17], or in understanding protein folding [21]. The unit determinant constraint is important in these situations because we typically cannot reflect physical objects such as spacecraft or molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the proof we refer to [23]. Proposition 2.1 holds also for PCS, thus the maximum number of independent metal ions is again 5.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Optimization, coordination, and consensus over the group of rotation matrices (i.e. over elements of SO(n)) is a problem of fundamental importance in a wide range of applications, from satellite attitude and spin estimation [1], [2], vehicle coordination [3], frequency synchronization [4], (distributed) visual pose estimation [5], [6], [7] and protein folding [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%