2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/pscc.2018.8442940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex Relaxations of Security Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow Under Uncertainty

Abstract: System operators have to ensure an N-1 secure operation, while dealing with higher degrees of uncertainty. This paper proposes a semidefinite relaxation of the chance and security constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF). Our main contributions are the introduction of systematic methods to obtain zero relaxation gap, providing a tractable chance constrained SCOPF formulation, and addressing scalability. We introduce a systematic procedure to obtain zero relaxation gap using a penalty term on power losses. To ach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for computationally more efficient convex relaxations of (chance-constrained) AC-OPFs was identified in [4], where we developed a SDP relaxation of the chanceconstrained AC-OPF based on rectangular and Gaussian uncertainty sets. Comparable instances to our case study may take up to 10 minutes to solve with the SDP relaxation (although the computational improvements proposed in [38] can reduce this time) whereas our proposed algorithm converges within 10.60 s. The solution time of the CC-SOC-OPF is mainly determined by the inner iteration loop for approximating the angle constraint (5), which accounts for 84% of the total solution time. More efficient approximations of the angle constraint, which can be implemented in an oneshot optimization, could significantly improve the performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Chance-constrained Soc-opfmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The need for computationally more efficient convex relaxations of (chance-constrained) AC-OPFs was identified in [4], where we developed a SDP relaxation of the chanceconstrained AC-OPF based on rectangular and Gaussian uncertainty sets. Comparable instances to our case study may take up to 10 minutes to solve with the SDP relaxation (although the computational improvements proposed in [38] can reduce this time) whereas our proposed algorithm converges within 10.60 s. The solution time of the CC-SOC-OPF is mainly determined by the inner iteration loop for approximating the angle constraint (5), which accounts for 84% of the total solution time. More efficient approximations of the angle constraint, which can be implemented in an oneshot optimization, could significantly improve the performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Chance-constrained Soc-opfmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If the rank is bigger than 2, then the original solution couldn't be solved. From the paper [14], if the eigenvalue ratio between the largest eigenvalue and the third largest eigenvalue is bigger than 10 5 , then then rank of matrix WAC could be seen less than or equal to 2. After achieving the feasible matrices WAC and WDC with suitable ranks, the voltages could be recovered.…”
Section: Ac Conv Dclinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of R N −2 depends on the maximum number of steps κ max,N −2 of the directed walks during the N-2 security database generation. As we aim for avoiding duplicates but also for maximizing the number of unique OPs within Ω, a choice of R N −2 ≤ κ max,N −2 · min{α k } is recommended, where min{α k } is the minimum step size as defined in (18).…”
Section: A Initialization Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a procedure similar to [18], we apply an iterative algorithm for the grid pruning: First, given η 1 initialization points, we solve (8) - (15) without considering contingencies, i.e. C = {0}.…”
Section: B Grid Pruning Algorithm For Search Space Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%