2009
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1264170844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convexity and smoothness of Banach spaces with numerical index one

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Banach space E is said to have the Mazur-Ulam property (briefly MUP) provided that for every Banach space F , every surjective isometry T between the two unit spheres of E and F is the restriction of a linear isometry between the two spaces.Cheng and Dong attacked the problem for the class of CL-spaces admitting a smooth point and polyhedral spaces. Unfortunately their interesting attempt failed by a mistake at the very end of the proof (also see the introduction in [10,28]). In [10], Kadets and Martín proved that finite-dimensional polyhedral Banach spaces have the MUP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Banach space E is said to have the Mazur-Ulam property (briefly MUP) provided that for every Banach space F , every surjective isometry T between the two unit spheres of E and F is the restriction of a linear isometry between the two spaces.Cheng and Dong attacked the problem for the class of CL-spaces admitting a smooth point and polyhedral spaces. Unfortunately their interesting attempt failed by a mistake at the very end of the proof (also see the introduction in [10,28]). In [10], Kadets and Martín proved that finite-dimensional polyhedral Banach spaces have the MUP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By Lemma 4.2 of [9], given y ∈ S X and ε > 0, there is a dense subset K y of K(X * ) (with the notation of section 3) such that y ∈ conv T S(S X , Re y * , ε) for every y * ∈ K y (observe that in [9, Lemma 4.2], K y is a subset of what is called K ′ (X * ) in the proof of Lemma 3.2, but since K(X * ) is also a Baire space, the same argument gives the result that we are using). Now, as the set of extreme points of B X * is contained in the closure of K y , there is y * ∈ K y such that Re y * (x) > 1 − ε, that is, x ∈ S(S X , Re y * , ε).…”
Section: Complex Lush Spaces and Lipschitz Numerical Indexmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our aim is to show that the same happens for complex spaces. We need a reformulation of lushness which follows from the results of [9]. Lemma 4.2.…”
Section: Complex Lush Spaces and Lipschitz Numerical Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, let X be a separable lush space. By [10,Theorem 4.3] and [3, Corollary 3.5], there exists a rounded subset C of S X * norming for X such that…”
Section: A Sufficient Condition For the Ahspmentioning
confidence: 99%