1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.11988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooper-pair and Bose-Einstein condensations in two dimensions: A critical analysis based on the Nozières and Schmitt-Rink formalism

Abstract: The crossover between the Cooper-pair condensation and the Bose-Einstein condensation of "dielectronic" molecules in two-dimensional superconductors is investigated in detail on the basis of the Nozieres and Schmitt-Rink formalism. It is shown that temperature dependence of the chemical potential p so calculated is classified into two classes as decreasing temperatures; i.e. , class (a) where p approaches the point of Bose-Einstein condensation of two-dimensional ideal Bose gas of "di-electronic" molecules, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the number of "flavors" of boson and χ 0 ≡ χ µ=0,T =0 ; we have subtracted the "vacuum" contribution at µ = T = 0, which in general leads a G-dependent fermion mass and wavefunction renormalization through a Hartree and higher order terms [75]. Some notes are in order here.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the number of "flavors" of boson and χ 0 ≡ χ µ=0,T =0 ; we have subtracted the "vacuum" contribution at µ = T = 0, which in general leads a G-dependent fermion mass and wavefunction renormalization through a Hartree and higher order terms [75]. Some notes are in order here.…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, µ can deviate from ε F in a more fundamental way when the quasi-molecules with q = 0, superfluid fluctuations, and the pre-formed Cooper-pairs are all properly included. [6,7,10] This is the goal of the present letter. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,10] In the present case, when we plot T c with respect to the effective pairing interaction, U eff = U + g 2 /(2ν − 2µ), we obtain the inset in Fig. 3(b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is the Noziéres-Schmitt-Rink (NSR) approximation [30][31][32]37] and the second method is based on the number density given by the dressed Green's function [13,38]. The motivation for studying the two approximations is the fact that the NSR scheme is numerically much more affordable but expected to be accurate only when self-energy corrections are small [38].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Chemical Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we have set = 1. Within the non-self-consistent ladder approximation [10,11,13,[30][31][32][33], the self-energy is given by the T -matrix and the bare Green's function,…”
Section: T-matrix and The Ladder Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%