2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
109
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently, this substrategy can be interpreted also as a means of reducing the relative cost of losing -losing is bad for the individual's reproductive success, but ostracism is worse (O'Connor 2000; Richerson and Boyd 2005). The threat of ostracism, incidentally, has consistently been shown to increase cooperation to the maximum level in economic games (Cinyabuguma et al 2005). For low status individuals, getting no attention at all may be worse than getting negative attention.…”
Section: Everyone's a Winnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, this substrategy can be interpreted also as a means of reducing the relative cost of losing -losing is bad for the individual's reproductive success, but ostracism is worse (O'Connor 2000; Richerson and Boyd 2005). The threat of ostracism, incidentally, has consistently been shown to increase cooperation to the maximum level in economic games (Cinyabuguma et al 2005). For low status individuals, getting no attention at all may be worse than getting negative attention.…”
Section: Everyone's a Winnermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter represent norm enforcing sanctions which are well studied in experimental economics (Falk et al, 2005;Cinyabuguma et al, 2005). However, little is know about the pattern of social sanctions outside of the lab.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe three types of length of reversible exclusion. In some studies, exclusion is irreversible (Cinyabuguma et al, 2005; Maier-Rigaud et al, 2010; Akpalu and Martinsson, 2011). An excluded subject remains ostracized until the end of the session.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%