1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00356315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative cavitation in rubber-toughened polycarbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the unmodified epoxy polymer, i.e. with no dispersed rubber phase, the rubber particles greatly increase the toughness of the material, see Table 1, via interactions of the stress field ahead of the crack tip and the rubber particles, which leads to greatly enhanced plastic deformation of the epoxy polymer [54][55][56].…”
Section: Fractographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the unmodified epoxy polymer, i.e. with no dispersed rubber phase, the rubber particles greatly increase the toughness of the material, see Table 1, via interactions of the stress field ahead of the crack tip and the rubber particles, which leads to greatly enhanced plastic deformation of the epoxy polymer [54][55][56].…”
Section: Fractographic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Cavitation of the rubber particles is the main mechanism for toughening of noncrystalline polymer/rubber blends. 10,11 In semicrystalline polymers such as PA-6,6 or PA-6, although the predominant mechanism for toughening is the shear banding, cavitation was also mentioned in the rubber phase followed by shear yielding of the polymer phase. 12,13 Rubber particles are responsible for void initiation internally on the particles or at the rubber-matrix boundary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The smaller particles shown which have cavitated have evolved into more or less ellipsoidal shapes. Similar shapes were observed in high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) where distributed crazing is an important matrix deformation mechanism (e.g., [10]), in polycarbonate (PC) blends which deform by shear yielding only (e.g., [11,12]) and in nylon blends (e.g., [13,14]). The shapes are consistent with the predicted void shapes in [4][5][6][7][8] at these rather small strain levels under tension with a mild stress triaxiality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%