2009
DOI: 10.1177/0278364908100561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative Localization for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

Abstract: Self-localization of an underwater vehicle is particularly challenging due to the absence of Global Positioning System (GPS) reception or features at known positions that could otherwise have been used for position computation. Thus Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) applications typically require the pre-deployment of a set of beacons.This thesis examines the scenario in which the members of a group of AUVs exchange navigation information with one another so as to improve their individual position estimates.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
144
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
144
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of AUV cooperative positioning is to have a vehicle with good quality positioning information (beacon vehicle), to transmit its position and range information acoustically to supported AUVs within its communication range during navigation. The range information between the vehicles can then be fused with the data obtained from proprioceptive sensors to reduce the positioning error during underwater navigation (Rui and Chitre 2010;Bahr et al 2009a). Since acoustic ranging only contains information in the direction of ranging, the performance of the approach relies on the ability of the beacon vehicle to perform ranging from different directions with respect to the supported vehicles (Song 1999;Gadre and Stilwell 2005).…”
Section: Acoustic Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of AUV cooperative positioning is to have a vehicle with good quality positioning information (beacon vehicle), to transmit its position and range information acoustically to supported AUVs within its communication range during navigation. The range information between the vehicles can then be fused with the data obtained from proprioceptive sensors to reduce the positioning error during underwater navigation (Rui and Chitre 2010;Bahr et al 2009a). Since acoustic ranging only contains information in the direction of ranging, the performance of the approach relies on the ability of the beacon vehicle to perform ranging from different directions with respect to the supported vehicles (Song 1999;Gadre and Stilwell 2005).…”
Section: Acoustic Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range information received is commonly used directly to influence the filter's measurement model for beacon-based underwater navigation (Rui and Chitre 2010;Bahr et al 2009a;Tan et al 2014;Maurya et al 2012;Webster et al 2013). However, our approach cannot fuse the range information directly because none of the vehicles in the team is equipped with high accuracy navigational sensors, and the PV may have accumulated significant error by the time the information is broadcast.…”
Section: Localization In the Case Of Multiple Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations have been done in regard to solving single-robot localization problems using the PF [17]. It has also been applied to multi-robot localization problems [5], [18], SLAM problems [19] and underwater localization problems [20].…”
Section: Pf-based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-agent cooperation is not only helpful but also necessary in small AUV swarms. In the past decade, CL has been widely applied to applications where GPS is not available including indoor and underwater applications [6]- [9]. However, at least one localization reference is required to bound the localization error of the entire mobile network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to faster coverage of an area, the use of multiple subsea vehicles also results in more accurate positioning information (Bahr et al, 2009.…”
Section: Cooperative Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%