Coordinated Awareness of Situation by Teams (CAST): Measuring Team Situation Awareness of a Communication Glitch

Gorman, Jamie C.; Cooke, Nancy J.; Pederson, Harry K.; Olena, O. Connor; DeJoode, Janie A.

doi:10.1177/154193120504900313

Cited by 42 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also I have shown that DSA provides far less explanation of SA in teams than other previous models and research on team and shared SA (Endsley & Jones, 2001;Endsley & Robertson, 2000;Gorman, Cooke, Pederson, Connor, & DeJoode, 2005;Prince & Salas, 1993;Prince, Salas, & Stout, 1995). In reviewing their response, it primarily focuses on issues of SA measurement in teams, specifically on the use of the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT), which I will address in more detail below.…”

Section: Distributed Sa (Dsa)mentioning

confidence: 95%

Final Reflections

Endsley

2015

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A response is provided to the many authors who commented on my initial paper for this special issue on situation awareness (SA) addressing remaining questions and observations on the Endsley 1995 model of SA. A discussion on historical perspectives on cognitive engineering and SA is included, along with future research needs for the construct. New models on sensemaking, distributed SA, and situated SA are also discussed, with remaining comments on their differences with the Endsley 1995 model of SA. Finally, a short discussion of SA measurement approaches is provided, addressing key issues raised in the commentaries.

show abstract

Section: Distributed Sa (Dsa)mentioning

confidence: 95%

Final Reflections

Endsley

2015

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CAST can observe team cognition directly without the need to draw inferences about it based on accumulated individual measures. Unlike knowledgebased measures relying on query methods that focus on outcome of assessment by probing the memory retrieval processes of operators, CAST measure is process oriented where its output reflects the process of SA assessment [40]. This difference has an important implication when applying to decentralized command and control environment where query measures have difficulties to diagnose the processes underlying poor team SA.…”

Section: B Team and Shared Samentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Situation Awareness Assessment Approaches in Aviation Environments

Nguyen

Lim

Nguyen

et al. 2019

IEEE Systems Journal

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Situation awareness (SA) is an important constituent in human information processing and essential in pilots' decision-making processes. Acquiring and maintaining appropriate levels of SA is critical in aviation environments as it affects all decisions and actions taking place in flights and air traffic control. This paper provides an overview of recent measurement models and approaches to establishing and enhancing SA in aviation environments. Many aspects of SA are examined including the classification of SA techniques into six categories, and different theoretical SA models from individual, to shared or team, and to distributed or system levels. Quantitative and qualitative perspectives pertaining to SA methods and issues of SA for unmanned vehicles are also addressed. Furthermore, future research directions regarding SA assessment approaches are raised to deal with shortcomings of the existing state-of-the-art methods in the literature.

show abstract

“…Another bunch of researches in this area focuses on the effect of situation awareness on the underlying factors of team performance [27], [12], [14]. The existing empirical literature concerning different aspects of team cognition and performance points out that team cognition underlies team performance.…”

Section: Team Cognition and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Capturing team performance differences through communication based analyses of team cognition

Soós

Juhász²

2010

Per. Pol. Soc. and Man. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Team cognition is shaped by team processes (such as interaction, communication) among the various multidisciplinary team members. Previous studies emphasize the importance of studying team cognition at a holistic level for tasks that require specialization of team members. In our view team cognition includes the team members' knowledge representations (individual mental and situational model) as well as those indispensable team processes that help to create and share the individual knowledge.Our aim was to explore team performance differences by applying the holistic view of team cognition, studying team communication. After some content based static and sequential communicational analyses, we studied some specific task related communicational utterances in the case of 16 NPP operator teams in simulation environment. The results have revealed the importance of well established task relevant information collection utterances, furthermore the crucial role of coherent information flow. Results are discussed in terms of the usefulness of communication utterances in establishing, modifying accurate team knowledge, in order to describe the underlying process of team performance differences.

show abstract

Coordinated Awareness of Situation by Teams (CAST): Measuring Team Situation Awareness of a Communication Glitch

Cited by 42 publications

References 6 publications

Final Reflections

Final Reflections

A Review of Situation Awareness Assessment Approaches in Aviation Environments

Capturing team performance differences through communication based analyses of team cognition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About