2010 Second International Conference on COMmunication Systems and NETworks (COMSNETS 2010) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/comsnets.2010.5432011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinated sampling sans Origin-Destination identifiers: Algorithms and analysis

Abstract: Abstract-Flow monitoring is used for a wide range of network management applications. Many such applications require that the monitoring infrastructure provide high flow coverage and support fine-grained network-wide objectives. Coordinated Sampling (cSamp) is a recent proposal that improves the monitoring capabilities of ISPs to address these demands.In this paper, we address a key deployment impediment for cSamp-like solutions-the need for routers to determine the Origin-Destination (OD) pair of each packet.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cSamp [21] coordinates network-wide routers using a hash-based method to sample packets that carry the OD pair information. To make cSamp practical, cSamp-T [20] removes the assumption of OD pair information on packet headers and Decor [23] applies local information to avoid using central controller.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…cSamp [21] coordinates network-wide routers using a hash-based method to sample packets that carry the OD pair information. To make cSamp practical, cSamp-T [20] removes the assumption of OD pair information on packet headers and Decor [23] applies local information to avoid using central controller.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cSamp [21] uses the hash values of the 5-tuples of packets to distribute sampling load among routers. However, cSamp requires all packets to carry their ingress-egress pairs, which are not available in practical networks [20]. The only two approaches that can achieve per-flow monitoring and load distribution are rulebased and aggregation-based flow monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, cSamp [22] uses the hash value of the 5-tuple of a packet to distribute sampling load among routers. However, cSamp requires all packets to carry their ingress-egress pairs, which are not available in practical networks [21]. The only two approaches that can achieve perflow monitoring and load distribution are rule-based and aggregationbased flow monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formulation assumes that routers in the middle of the network can infer the OD-pair from packet headers using MPLS labels or ingress-egress prefix maps[6]. cSamp can also be implemented without OD-pair identifiers[40]. For clarity, we describe the simpler approach using OD-pairs 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%