Coordinating intermediaries: The prospects and limitations of professional associations in decentralized regulation

Abstract

A key question in understanding regulation through independent intermediaries is the extent to which intermediary actions are either coordinated, thereby supporting consistency in regulatory application, or uncoordinated, leading to monitoring and enforcement disparities. This paper examines professional associations as one mechanism by which policy action may be coordinated in decentralized arrangements. Professional associations provide means and venues for members to interact, offer training and education that develops shared understanding of policy directives, are collective representation bodies for professional members, and may play an important role in establishing and enforcing collective standards for appropriate behavior. We examine these functions in the decentralized administration of United States organic food certification, focusing on two relevant professional associationsthe Accredited Certifiers Association and the International Organic Inspectors Association. Drawing on multiple methods, including interviews and survey data, our findings indicate that professional organic certification associations provide valuable education and training, disseminate information, and facilitate knowledge sharing among administrative entities and with regulatory authorities. We conclude with a discussion of the prospects and limitations of professional associations for third-party regulation, and how accounting for professional association functions can improve our understanding of regulatory intermediary coordination and conduct.

Outsourcing the enforcement of modern slavery: Overcoming the limitations of a market-based disclosure model

“…Regulatory intermediaries provide opportunities for enhanced regulatory outcomes, but they also present challenges, including reliance by the State on enforcement actors such as civil society groups with limited resources, as well as the risk of intermediaries becoming captured by the interests of the regulatory target (the corporations) (Abbott, Levi-Faur and Snidal, 2017;Carter and Mahallati, 2019). Therefore, it is important to balance the participation of intermediaries with complementary State enforcement mechanisms and adequate resourcing of State-based regulatory agencies.…”

Private facilitators of public regulation: A study of the environmental consulting industry

“…Some were white papers intended for broader audiences or amicus briefs submitted to courts. While industry associations have their own institutional interests (Carter & Mahallati 2017), consultants generally agreed that these associations provided good proxies for their members' views. This documentary evidence helped check whether interviewees' assertions about the consulting industry aligned with consultants' positions and actions in actual policymaking processes.…”

An Integrative Conceptual Framework of Food Certifications: Systematic Review, Research Agenda, and Macromarketing Implications

“…The studies aim to evaluate the coordination of third-parties in food certification (Carter and Mahallati 2019;Zhang et al 2015) Performance measurement for food certification…”