2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination and communication during bank runs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is also in line with recent research pointing out the importance of observability of actions in bank run episodes (e.g. see Starr and Yilmaz, 2007; Garratt and Keister, 2009; Schotter and Yorulmazer, 2009; Iyer et al , 2012; Kiss et al , 2014; Shakina and Angerer, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach is also in line with recent research pointing out the importance of observability of actions in bank run episodes (e.g. see Starr and Yilmaz, 2007; Garratt and Keister, 2009; Schotter and Yorulmazer, 2009; Iyer et al , 2012; Kiss et al , 2014; Shakina and Angerer, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…7. The experimental literature on bank runs includes, among others, Schotter and Yorulmazer (2009), Garratt and Keister (2009), Arifovic et al (2013), Kiss et al (2014, 2016b, 2018), Davis and Reilly (2016) or Shakina and Angerer (2018). The reader interested in this literature may also refer to Dufwenberg (2015), Duffy (2016) and Kiss et al (2016a).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results show that the effects of disclosure may point in opposite directions, depending on the re-contracting posture adopted by the banking authority. Shakina and Angerer (2018) study depositors' behavior in a much less restricted setting than previous studies. Their depositors can continuously withdraw and re-deposit funds without any order being enforced.…”
Section: Arifovicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a convergence of these spheres appears, which makes intra, interactive and massive processes merge through interpersonal technological contexts in ways that are still in the process of being defined. This change allows us to recognise the capacity of human communication to make its dimensions of action more flexible, that is, the ineffectiveness of concepts such as identity, authorship, active sender, passive receiver, in the face of phenomena such as current digital convergence [37,40,50].…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%