2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25044-6_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordination, Conventions and the Self-organisation of Sustainable Institutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This aligns with similar results by Pitt et al [8]. By contrast, the copy-satisfied-if-dissatisfied learning rule captures complacency of satisfied agents, who, due to their satisfaction, do not change their strategy.…”
Section: Impact Of Different Forms Of Social Learningsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This aligns with similar results by Pitt et al [8]. By contrast, the copy-satisfied-if-dissatisfied learning rule captures complacency of satisfied agents, who, due to their satisfaction, do not change their strategy.…”
Section: Impact Of Different Forms Of Social Learningsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, our approach to aid the translation of interpretable contracts into codified institutional representations does not exist in isolation. Pitt et al [12] describe an approach that is inspired by Ostrom's institutional framework [6] and uses event calculus to represent nested institutional rule sets in self-organising systems. Similarly, da Silva Figueiredo et al [13] propose a generic description language that formalises the norm specifications comprehensively, similar to the nADICO structure used in this work.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Pitt et al [2011c], we have also considered the case of endogenous resource provision and cluster formation using the Linear Public Good game [Gaechter 2006]. This game is concerned with provision and appropriation of resources, in which individual utility is maximized by free-riding (i.e., providing nothing and appropriating an equal share) if everyone else provides a full share, but minimized if everyone tries to free-ride.…”
Section: Related Work and Further Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%