Coordination of Retailer-Led Closed Loop Supply Chain Considering Corporate Social Responsibility

Zhao, Huanhuan; Liu, Yong; Liu, Zhiyang

doi:10.3390/su141710851

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Zhong et al [53] concentrated on the e-waste recycling model under an EPR deposit refund system, concentrating on the concerns of e-waste recycling channels and government subsidy policies, giving a fresh viewpoint for supply chain analysis. Zhao et al [45] analyzed how retailers' CSR efforts affected CLSC members' optimal decision making and coordination The above situation shows that echeloned utilization has a significant stimulating effect on the overall profit of CLSC. Compared with other modes, mode A has the highest total profit of CLSC and the recovery of power batteries, and the increase in the echeloned utilization rate has a significantly stronger effect on Model RM and Model A than Model R and Model N, which proves that under these two subsidy conditions, the increased echeloned utilization can help improve the overall profit of the supply chain.…”

Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…He P et al [44] examined the government's subsidy approach for new and remanufactured items to determine the ideal channel layout and pricing decision for the producer and the optimal government subsidy level in each of these three channels. Hh Zhao et al [45] analyzed how retailers' CSR efforts affected CLSC members' optimal decision making and coordination and analyzed the effect of different government incentives on CLSC coordination. The analysis shows that the improvement of total profit in the channel could be massive.…”

Section: Research Related To Clsc Operation Decisions Under Governmen...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With new energy vehicles becoming the mainstream of new vehicles sold, the surge in user ownership has triggered a wave of power battery scrapping, and the environmental problems caused by improper power battery recycling are becoming more serious. It is essential to promote the development of the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) of power batteries effectively through government subsidies under the extended producer responsibility (EPR) regime. Combining the EPR system with the battery manufacturer as the leader and the vehicle manufacturer and the retailer as the subordinates, this paper constructs and solves four models of different CLSC subsidy objects and analyzes the pricing of power batteries by different subsidy objects by using the Stackelberg game, as well as the profit change and profit distribution ratio of each CLSC participant. The results of the study showed: (1) when the unit subsidy is limited, the government should subsidize all the CLSC subjects as much as possible. (2) When the government subsidizes the remanufacturing of power batteries, the recycling rate of power batteries is higher, and the benefits of the CLSC are better than those of subsidizing other actors. (3) The change in government subsidy objects will not affect the profit distribution ratio of CLSC, mainly because the subsidy not only improves the recovery rate, but also improves the profitability of each entity.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion and Management Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Research Related To Clsc Operation Decisions Under Governmen...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some of them can be corroborated with previous related research. Zhao et al [35] believed that the investment of CSR can promote the overall development of CLSCs. This paper not only considers the investment of CSR, but also considers the implementation of the government's reward-penalty policy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Recycling Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR under the Government’s Reward–Penalty Policy

Song

Liu

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) is the process of adding a reverse supply chain to the traditional forward supply chain. It has a positive effect on reducing environmental pollution, and therefore many governments have introduced relevant policies to encourage enterprises to develop CLSCs. Among them, the reward–penalty policy (RPP) for the recovery rate of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) is considered better. At the corporate level, the development of CLSCs can enhance the social responsibility awareness of the enterprise and effectively enhance the corporate image. Therefore, in order to study the decision making and recycling channel selection of CLSCs that consider corporate social responsibility (CSR) under the government’s RPP, this paper constructs a two-stage CLSC, including a manufacturer, a retailer, a third-party recycler, and the government. By adopting the Stackelberg game method, we determine the optimal results of the three models and draw a series of conclusions: (1) when the manufacturer is responsible for recycling WEEE, the profit is the largest, and it shows an increasing trend as the government’s reward–penalty coefficient increases; (2) the manufacturer recycling model enables the manufacturer to obtain the maximum CSR investment level, followed by the third -party recycler recycling model, and the smallest is the retailer recycling model; and (3) the government tends to build third-party recycling agencies, which is conducive to improving the level of contribution to GDP. The conclusion of this paper has certain management inspirations for the decision making of the enterprise and the formulation of government policies.

show abstract

“…Wu et al [ 12 ] explored the impacts of different corporate social responsibility (CSR)-undertaking-mode choices on the carbon-emission reduction and technological innovation decisions of the low-carbon supply chain. With respect to the coordination problems of closed-loop supply chains led by retailers, Zhao et al [ 13 ] established some models considering manufacturer’s CSR, exploited them to compare the optimal decisions under centralized and decentralized decisions, explored the impact of CSR on supply-chain decisions, and designed a coordination mechanism through two-step pricing. Wang et al [ 14 ] considered a three-echelon closed-loop supply chain consisting of a manufacturer with corporate social responsibility (CSR), a retailer with sales effort, and a third party who is responsible for collecting used products.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision models of emission reduction considering CSR under reward-penalty policy

Wang

Xiu-ling

Zhou³

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the two emission reduction technologies of clean process (CT Mode) and end-of-pipe pollution control technology (ET Mode), this paper constructs production and low-carbon R&D decision-making models considering consumers’ green preference, and discusses the impact of social responsibility on firm’s decision-making, profit and social welfare. Then, the difference of optimal decision, profit and social welfare is analyzed when the firm adopt two emission reduction technologies with or without reward-penalty policy. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) Whether using clean process technology or end-of-pipe pollution control technology, consumers’ green preference behavior can increase corporate profit. When consumers’ green preference is small, consumers’ green preference is negatively correlated with social welfare. When consumers’ green preference is large, consumers’ green preference is positively correlated with social welfare. (2) Corporate social responsibility is conducive to improving the level of social welfare, not conducive to the increase of corporate profits. (3) When the reward and punishment intensity is small, the reward-penalty policy cannot effectively motivate the firm to assume social responsibility. Only when the reward and punishment reaches a certain level, the mechanism can have an incentive effect on the firm, and the government can actively implement the mechanism. (4) When the market scale is small, the adoption of end-of-pipe pollution control technology is more beneficial to the firm; When the market scale is large, it is beneficial for the firm to adopt clean technology. (5) If the efficiency of end-of-pipe pollution control and emission reduction is much higher than that of clean process, the firm should choose end-of-pipe pollution control technology, otherwise choose clean process.

show abstract

Coordination of Retailer-Led Closed Loop Supply Chain Considering Corporate Social Responsibility

Cited by 6 publications

References 27 publications

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System

Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making of Power Battery Considering Subsidy Transfer under EPR System

The Recycling Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR under the Government’s Reward–Penalty Policy

Decision models of emission reduction considering CSR under reward-penalty policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About