2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coordinative real‐time sub‐transmission volt–var control for reactive power regulation between transmission and distribution systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important to derive the required reactive power by learning the situation in which the voltage will change for an event such as a specific accident or output change in an offline manner, and accordingly, an appropriate setting of the dead band value contributes to maintaining the voltage range. The required reactive power Q req can be calculated using Equation (11), which indicates the relationship between the change in voltage magnitude and that in the reactive power obtained through voltage sensitivity analysis, and the values of the reference voltage and measured voltage, V POI,re f and V POI,mea , at the POI.…”
Section: Proposed Reactive Power-voltage Droop Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is important to derive the required reactive power by learning the situation in which the voltage will change for an event such as a specific accident or output change in an offline manner, and accordingly, an appropriate setting of the dead band value contributes to maintaining the voltage range. The required reactive power Q req can be calculated using Equation (11), which indicates the relationship between the change in voltage magnitude and that in the reactive power obtained through voltage sensitivity analysis, and the values of the reference voltage and measured voltage, V POI,re f and V POI,mea , at the POI.…”
Section: Proposed Reactive Power-voltage Droop Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of a DG with high variability in a conventional network may create a voltage problem [7,8]. Regarding voltage regulation in transmission systems, several coordination strategies have been proposed so far, which can be classified into two groups: (1) coordinated control between DGs and reactive power compensation facilities, such as a flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) [9,10], and (2) supplementary control functions, which have been implemented for DGs to use the advanced reactive power-voltage control method [11][12][13]. To achieve advanced control ability, previous studies have focused on decentralized and centralized control strategies [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function f (u, t, p G , q G , p f , q f , p t , q t , v) in (1a) may represent any objective function related to the ORPD problem: power loss, voltage deviation, number of control actions, generation cost, etc. Some of them are considered in [27]. We note that power loss is a widely used objective function for the ORPD problem.…”
Section: Orpd: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, distribution networks may also need to combine day-ahead scheduling with real-time dispatch [10] as in transmission. Besides, some authors point out that coordinated actions between both operators would allow to achieve effective and efficient voltage control and congestion management [11] as well as regulate active and reactive power exchange at frontier nodes [12,13] to guarantee security, reliability, and cost-efficiency. However, the high number of DRES, which may be spread, pose a challenge to traditional systems [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%