2003 IEEE 29th Annual Proceedings of Bioengineering Conference
DOI: 10.1109/nebc.2003.1216028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COPD severity classification using principal component and cluster analysis on HRV parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the use of image processing requires much computation power, they achieved a low classification accuracy. Several studies They identified five COPD severities with higher accuracy rates than 88% using principal component analysis and cluster analysis [11]. Whereas HRV measurements are decisive features for cardiac disorders, they act as supportive diagnostics, not a definitive diagnostic tool for respiratory diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though the use of image processing requires much computation power, they achieved a low classification accuracy. Several studies They identified five COPD severities with higher accuracy rates than 88% using principal component analysis and cluster analysis [11]. Whereas HRV measurements are decisive features for cardiac disorders, they act as supportive diagnostics, not a definitive diagnostic tool for respiratory diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newandee et al proposed a method that was based on heart rate variability (HRV) measurements to diagnose COPD. They classified COPD and non-COPD subjects using principal component analysis and clustering algorithms [11]. Altan et al proposed a nonlinear method to quantize consecutive differences of the data points on lung sounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the encoding step, we processed each sensor data sequence Sn assigning a symbol to each 1-min data sample. METs data were encoded with the symbols S, VL, L and MV using the thresholds and intensity categories (IC) proposed by the American College of Sports Medicine [13]: very light intensity (VL), < 2.0 METs; light intensity (L), 2.0 to 2.9 METs; moderate-to-vigorous intensity (MV), ≥ 3.0 METs. Epochs marked by the activity monitor as sleeping and with METs < 2.0 formed a separate category named sleeping (S).…”
Section: Sequence Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arpaia et al [12] proposed a method based on particle swarm optimization to predict the condition of a subject with COPD from clinical parameters monitored monthly for one year. Newandee et al [13] applied cluster analysis to identify the most severe patients with COPD in a mixture of healthy and COPD population for which heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration signals were recorded. Results demonstrated that these two groups could be differentiated with 99.0% accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%