2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coping profiles and their association with psychological functioning: A latent profile analysis of coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(63 reference statements)
6
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Zacher and Rudolph (2021b) reported positive relations between active coping and positive cognitive restructuring with regard to life satisfaction and negative relations between planning and life satisfaction. The use of social support was related to an increase in life satisfaction (for instrumental support) in addition to higher levels of positive affect and lower levels of negative affect (for emotional support), but also higher levels of negative affect (for instrumental support; Zacher and Rudolph, 2021b), and showed low levels of wellbeing (Kavčič et al, 2022), supporting the notion of social support as "double-edge sword" (Carver et al, 1989;Revenson et al, 1991). Avoidant coping strategies were positively related with higher negative affect (Zacher and Rudolph, 2021b), depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress (Agha, 2021;Minahan et al, 2021;Kavčič et al, 2022).…”
Section: Coping Strategies Personality and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, Zacher and Rudolph (2021b) reported positive relations between active coping and positive cognitive restructuring with regard to life satisfaction and negative relations between planning and life satisfaction. The use of social support was related to an increase in life satisfaction (for instrumental support) in addition to higher levels of positive affect and lower levels of negative affect (for emotional support), but also higher levels of negative affect (for instrumental support; Zacher and Rudolph, 2021b), and showed low levels of wellbeing (Kavčič et al, 2022), supporting the notion of social support as "double-edge sword" (Carver et al, 1989;Revenson et al, 1991). Avoidant coping strategies were positively related with higher negative affect (Zacher and Rudolph, 2021b), depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress (Agha, 2021;Minahan et al, 2021;Kavčič et al, 2022).…”
Section: Coping Strategies Personality and Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Mediation analyses: Do coping strategies mediate the relationships between individual and organizational soldier student factors and loneliness, life satisfaction, and COVID-19 stress? Expected relations between personality and organizational predictors and coping strategies (for personality see Connor-Smith and Flachsbart, 2007;Agbaria and Mokh, 2021; for organizational predictors see Srivastava and Tang, 2015;Portero de la Cruz et al, 2020;Rojas et al, 2022) are presented in Table 1 along with expected relations between coping strategies and psychological health outcomes (Deckx et al, 2018;Gori et al, 2020;Minahan et al, 2021;Zacher and Rudolph, 2021b;Kavčič et al, 2022). The respective expected indirect effects can be obtained by multiplying the two direct effects (i.e., two positive and two negative direct effects yield a positive indirect effect, one positive and one negative direct effect yield a negative indirect effect, and if at least one direct effect is zero, the indirect effect will be zero).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, planning, a primary coping strategy, appeared to be detrimental during the early days of the pandemic. 2 In another study that investigated coping strategies during the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in Slovenia, 17 researchers identified three types of coping profiles: engaged profile (high levels of problem-focused coping, acceptance, and positive reframing), disengaged profile (low levels of problem-focused coping, acceptance, and social support), and avoidant profile (substance use, self-blame, and humor). Engaged coping, which is a combination of primary and secondary coping in our model, was associated with lower levels of anxiety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya mengelompokkan strategi koping ke dalam dua kategori yakni strategi koping berfokus pada emosi (emotion focused coping) dan strategi koping berfokus pada masalah (problem focused coping). Penelitian lainnya menjelaskan konstruk strategi koping ke dalam kategori avoidant coping, approach coping, dan humor/religious coping (Awoke et al, 2021) atau konstruk strategi koping ke dalam selfsufficient, avoidant-coping, dan socially supported (Litman, 2006), ataupun engaged coping, disengaged coping, dan avoidant coping (Kavčič et al, 2022). Penggunaan strategi koping bergantung pada kondisi yang dihadapi oleh individu dan memungkinkan bagi individu untuk menggunakan kombinasi dari strategi koping yang dihadapi.…”
unclassified
“…14 jenis strategi koping menurut (Carver, 1997) digunakan untuk menggambarkan jenis strategi koping mahasiswa dan dikaji pengaruhnya terhadap stres pada mahasiswa. Skala ini juga digunakan pada penelitian sebelumnya untuk menggambarkan profil strategi koping mahasiswa (Awoke et al, 2021;Kavčič et al, 2022;Kumanova & Karastoyanov, 2013;Nursadrina & Andriani, 2020). Harapannya, penelitian ini dapat memberikan gambaran strategi koping yang lebih mendetail pada mahasiswa.…”
unclassified