2015
DOI: 10.7185/geochemlet.1506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper isotope evidence for large-scale sulphide fractionation during Earth’s differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
187
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
13
187
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A reasonable explanation for the Cu isotope discrepancy between the BSE and chondrites replies on Cu isotope fractionation during iron-sulfide/silicate segregation during core formation and core-mantle interaction. A recent study proposed that the heavier Cu isotopic composition of the BSE than the chondritic bulk Earth may result from preferential partitioning of light Cu isotopes into sulphide during core formation (Savage et al, 2015). This evokes the potential using Cu isotopes to understand the core-mantle differentiation process.…”
Section: Cu Isotopic Composition Of the Bse And Comparison With Othermentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reasonable explanation for the Cu isotope discrepancy between the BSE and chondrites replies on Cu isotope fractionation during iron-sulfide/silicate segregation during core formation and core-mantle interaction. A recent study proposed that the heavier Cu isotopic composition of the BSE than the chondritic bulk Earth may result from preferential partitioning of light Cu isotopes into sulphide during core formation (Savage et al, 2015). This evokes the potential using Cu isotopes to understand the core-mantle differentiation process.…”
Section: Cu Isotopic Composition Of the Bse And Comparison With Othermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The stable isotope system of Cu may hold the potential to constrain the crust-mantle differentiation and mantle-core differentiation processes that involve Cu partitioning between sulfides and silicates (Savage et al, 2015). For these applications the Cu isotopic compositions of the silicate Earth's reservoirs and possible Cu isotope fractionation during mantle partial melting, slab fluid enrichment and magmatic differentiation need to be constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ikehata and Hirata [58] suggested the range of terrestrial magmatic copper is −0.27‰ to 0.27‰. In general, the δ 65 Cu of terrestrial basalt is~0‰ [4,54,59]. The δ 65 Cu bulk silicate Earth is estimated to be +0.06 ± 0.20, and thus, fractionation during partial melting is limited [54].…”
Section: Initial δ 65 Cu Composition Of Source Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of metal-silicate experiments 664 performed by Savage et al (2015b) indicated that the heavier Cu isotope prefers to enter 665 the metal phase. This would suggest (given that 2/3 of Earth's Cu is in the core) that bulk 666…”
Section: Cu Contents Do Not Plot On Olivine Control Lines (Savage Et mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be that impact-driven volatilization created this depletion, 673 which would preferentially lead to the loss of light Cu, leaving a heavy residue. suggests that, if such a reservoir formed and eventually was admixed into the 694 core (it would sink through the mantle due to its higher density), it could add 695 up to ~0.8wt.% S to the core (Savage et al 2015b). 696…”
Section: Cu Contents Do Not Plot On Olivine Control Lines (Savage Et mentioning
confidence: 99%