2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.08.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper-substituted, lithium rich iron phosphate as cathode material for lithium secondary batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed impurity phases were consistent with the phases observed in other olivine compounds such as LiFePO 4 . 114,115 The half-cells comprising LiMnPO 4 , Li 1.1 MnPO 4 and Li 1.2 MnPO 4 phases displayed almost the same initial discharge capacity of $124 mA h g À1 at 0.05 C rate between 2 and 4.5 V by CC-CV mode, whereas Li 0.5 MnPO 4 and Li 0.8 MnPO 4 exhibited $75 and 110 mA h g À1 , respectively. Li 1.1 MnPO 4 showed extremely stable performance of $130 mA h g À1 in the 80 th cycle.…”
Section: Precipitation Routementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The observed impurity phases were consistent with the phases observed in other olivine compounds such as LiFePO 4 . 114,115 The half-cells comprising LiMnPO 4 , Li 1.1 MnPO 4 and Li 1.2 MnPO 4 phases displayed almost the same initial discharge capacity of $124 mA h g À1 at 0.05 C rate between 2 and 4.5 V by CC-CV mode, whereas Li 0.5 MnPO 4 and Li 0.8 MnPO 4 exhibited $75 and 110 mA h g À1 , respectively. Li 1.1 MnPO 4 showed extremely stable performance of $130 mA h g À1 in the 80 th cycle.…”
Section: Precipitation Routementioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 44,137,172 ] Hence, the well-established low-potential (≈3.4 V vs . [177][178][179][180][181][182][183] The loss in operating potential could be compromised by the high reversible capacity of LiFePO 4 (150-160 mAh g −1 ) compared to LiMn 2 O 4 (110-130 mAh g −1 ) in half-cell assemblies. [177][178][179][180][181][182][183] The loss in operating potential could be compromised by the high reversible capacity of LiFePO 4 (150-160 mAh g −1 ) compared to LiMn 2 O 4 (110-130 mAh g −1 ) in half-cell assemblies.…”
Section: Ti 5 O 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li) olivine LiFePO 4 was replaced with spinel phase LiMn 2 O 4 , which tends to decrease the net operating potential of the system from ≈2.5 to ≈1.9 V . The net operating potential is lower, but the olivine phase LiFePO 4 exhibits similar characteristics, such ashigh power capability, cost, safety, and high thermal stability . The loss in operating potential could be compromised by the high reversible capacity of LiFePO 4 (150–160 mAh g −1 ) compared to LiMn 2 O 4 (110–130 mAh g −1 ) in half‐cell assemblies .…”
Section: Intercalationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon-coated LiFePO 4 materials showed a slightly lower lattice parameter value than the uncoated material due to the absence of impurity phases. Furthermore, the absence of a peak at 2Â = 27 and 41 • indicated the phase purity of the synthesized material without impurities such as Li 3 Fe 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , FeP, and Fe 2 S [8,13,25,26]. The XRD pattern revealed that carbonization of AA not only provides the carbon coating, but also provides a reducing atmosphere that favors the formation of phase pure LiFePO 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first is to reduce the grain size of the cathode particles, which would shorten the diffusion path length for both electrons and Li + ions. The second is the use of surface-modified LiFePO 4 with a conductive matrix made of carbon [4][5][6], copper [7,8] and silver [9], or doping with some guest species [10]. Of these methods, surface-modified LiFePO 4 with carbon has proved to be an excellent alternative in the search for improved * Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%