In this study, the grain boundary diffusion of Cu through a TiN layer with columnar structure was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was observed that Cu atoms diffuse from the Cu layer to the surface along the grain boundaries in the TiN layer at elevated temperature. In order to estimate the grain boundary diffusion constants, we used the surface accumulation method. The diffusivity of Cu through TiN layer with columnar structure from 400The present semiconductor devices such as ULSI require the higher integration density with smaller submicron design scheme. However, aluminum and aluminum-based metallization have some problems such as the relatively higher resistance and the failure caused by the electromigration. At present, Cu has attracted more attention as a new interconnection metallization material, because of its low resistivity (1.67 µΩ cm for bulk), and high reliability against electromigration (EM) [1,2]. However, Cu is regarded as a fatal impurity in the semiconductor fabrication process due to its high diffusivity in Si (diffusion coefficient ≈ 10 −8 cm 2 /s at room temperature) [3][4][5]. Therefore, a thin diffusion barrier preventing Cu diffusion in Si substrate is needed in order to successfully integrate Cu as an interconnecting layer.TiN is one of the most widely investigated barrier materials in Cu metallization, as well as in Al-based metallization. Thus, there are many reports for the Cu diffusion in TiN during the annealing even though the failure temperatures of TiN against Cu diffusion differ among researchers [6-10]. Generally, it was known that the grain boundaries of TiN film act as a main diffusion path of Cu or Si [8]. Therefore, to understand the temperature failure mechanisms of TiN against Cu, an investigation of the diffusivity and diffusion mechanisms of Cu in TiN thin film are needed.From the results of Chamberlain [11], the grain boundary diffusivity (D b ) and the activation energy (Q b ) of Cu in the Cu/TiN/sapphire system were 10 −17 -10 −19 cm 2 /s and 4.4 eV, respectively, at temperature region from 600 • C to 700 • C. His results indicate that TiN in Cu metallization is a better barrier system than that in Al metallization since Q b and D b of Al through TiN layer were 0.31 eV and ≈ 10 −16 cm 2 /s, respectively, from 300 • C to 550 • C [12]. Although the differences in failure temperatures and diffusion coefficients are caused by various film microstructures and characterization methods, the grain boundary diffusion coefficients of Chamberlain [11], are too different from those of Al through TiN layer. In general, the value of Q b is approximately half of that for lattice diffusion [13] and in the range of T < 1 3 T m , the smaller the measurement temperature T is, the smaller the value of Q b should be [14]. Therefore, his values of diffusion coefficient seem to be unreasonable from a view point of the grain boundary diffusion. In fact, his Q b , 4.4 eV, for Cu in TiN layer is closed to the value of the bulk (=lattice) diffusion.To study this gr...