2012
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corneal Biomechanical Properties from Two-Dimensional Corneal Flap Extensiometry: Application to UV-Riboflavin Cross-Linking

Abstract: PURPOSE. Corneal biomechanical properties are usually measured by strip extensiometry or inflation methods. We developed a two-dimensional (2D) flap extensiometry technique, combining the advantages of both methods, and applied it to measure the effect of UV-Riboflavin cross-linking (CXL).METHODS. Corneal flaps (13 pig/8 rabbit) from the deepithelialized anterior stroma (96 lm) were mounted on a custom chamber, consisting of a BK7 lens, a reflective retina, and two reservoirs (filled with Riboflavin and silico… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods captured the inter-eye differences of the measured samples. On the other hand the reconstructed values are in agreement with previous reports in the literature on porcine corneas: 0.8–2.6 MPa from Wollensak et al using uniaxial extensiometry [37]; 0.6–3.9 MPa from Kling et al, using eye’s inflation [15]. The differences between the measured and simulated results may come from the assumptions of the material models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both methods captured the inter-eye differences of the measured samples. On the other hand the reconstructed values are in agreement with previous reports in the literature on porcine corneas: 0.8–2.6 MPa from Wollensak et al using uniaxial extensiometry [37]; 0.6–3.9 MPa from Kling et al, using eye’s inflation [15]. The differences between the measured and simulated results may come from the assumptions of the material models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A disadvantage of these tests is that post-mortem time influences the hydration state of the cornea, which in turn affects the mechanical properties [11]. Also, tests requiring the use of corneal strips are affected by the orientation and density of the collagen fibers [1214], and changes in the boundary conditions [15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twodimensional extensometry 30 as applied in this study resembles the natural condition in a more realistic way than onedimensional extensometry, which has been used for the biomechanical analysis of porcine, rabbit, and human corneas. 6,16 We could confirm the finding of a previous study 17 that viscoelastic testing approaches, such as stress-relaxation or creep tests, are more sensitive to measure the effect of CXL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex-vivo biomechanical testing methods currently applied to measure corneas include tensile stretching (or strip extensiometry) 720 , bulge/inflation testing 18, 2127 , nanoindentation testing (atomic force microscopy, AFM) 2835 , indentation testing 36 , shear testing 4, 37 , and acoustic radiation force elastic microscopy 38 . Despite the existence of a variety of characterization methods available, the published values derived from such techniques lack reproducibility, evidenced by the large range of reported corneal Young’s modulus of elasticity values in literature (0.57kPa – 41MPa) 718, 2136, 39 . Although the varied nature of the characterization methods may contribute to the sizable range of published elasticity values, one should not assume that this is the sole reason.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%