2015
DOI: 10.2147/rrcc.s73660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous intervention in coronary revascularization: a historical perspective and review

Abstract: Background: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery is arguably the most intensively studied surgical procedure, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been subjected to more randomized clinical trials than any other interventional procedure. Changes seen in revascularization techniques have been numerous. The rapid evolution of evidence-based revascularization procedures has occurred as a result of many pivotal large randomized clinical trials. Objective: This review compares and contrasts outcomes fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 93 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a clinical setup, coronary artery blockages are predominantly treated by an invasive coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, in which an alternative artery or vein from the body is used to bypass the blocked part to resume proper circulation [7]. However, there are certain disadvantages associated with CABG that include harvesting of blood vessels from the body, the requirement of healthy patent conduits, degeneration of these grafts over time, and the requirement of longer recovery time [8]. The current gold standard treatment approach is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which is a minimally invasive surgical procedure to treat stenosis (abnormal narrowing of blood vessels).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a clinical setup, coronary artery blockages are predominantly treated by an invasive coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, in which an alternative artery or vein from the body is used to bypass the blocked part to resume proper circulation [7]. However, there are certain disadvantages associated with CABG that include harvesting of blood vessels from the body, the requirement of healthy patent conduits, degeneration of these grafts over time, and the requirement of longer recovery time [8]. The current gold standard treatment approach is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which is a minimally invasive surgical procedure to treat stenosis (abnormal narrowing of blood vessels).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%