2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary Artery Perforation After Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy

Abstract: Severely calcified coronary lesions remain a challenge in current percutaneous coronary interventions. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (Shockwave Medical, Inc., Santa Clara, California) is an alternative for rotational atherectomy in such lesions that supports stent deliverability and achieves optimal results. We describe a case of coronary artery perforation after use of this lithotripsy device. ( Level of Difficulty: Advanced. )

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported a mean number of pulses per lithotripsy run was 33 ± 32, with a success rate of 90.1%, and two (2.4%) IVL‐related perforations 12 . Simsek et al 11 reported a case of coronary perforation after 40 intracoronary IVL pulses were delivered in a freshly implanted under‐expanded stent.…”
Section: Safety Of Ivlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported a mean number of pulses per lithotripsy run was 33 ± 32, with a success rate of 90.1%, and two (2.4%) IVL‐related perforations 12 . Simsek et al 11 reported a case of coronary perforation after 40 intracoronary IVL pulses were delivered in a freshly implanted under‐expanded stent.…”
Section: Safety Of Ivlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Although no complications were observed in the DISRUPT studies, perforations have been reported in some studies and case reports. 11,12 In the PROGRESS-CTO study, Kostantinis et al investigated the clinical safety of IVL use in CTO lesions. They reported a mean number of pulses per lithotripsy run was 33 ± 32, with a success rate of 90.1%, and two (2.4%) IVL-related perforations.…”
Section: Safety Of Ivl 21 | Short-term Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 Recently there is a case report of perforation following this therapy. 66 Furthermore, vessels with a diameter >4mm (maximum shockwave balloon size), or important plaque eccentricity, preclude appropriate IVL balloon apposition to the vessel wall, and may reduce the efficacy of the therapy. The Disrupt-CAD (Disrupt Coronary Artery Disease) trial, a prospective multicenter, single-arm study enrolling 60 patients with heavy CAC,treated with shockwave IVL, reported 98% device success, 100% stent delivery, low MACE rate, high acute gain and no cases of dissection, perforation, abrupt closure, or no-flow or slowflow phenomena.…”
Section: Intravascular Lithotripsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 There are anecdotal reports of coronary perforation with the use of IVL. 40,41 IVL is to be used with caution in critical lesions and in very tortuous vessels. In vessel size > 4 mm or eccentric calcium plaques which prevent appropriate IVL balloon apposition to vessel wall, the success of IVL decreases and other options need to be explored.…”
Section: Intravascular Lithotripsy (Ivl)mentioning
confidence: 99%