No abstract

The SES implantation in patients with severe ISR lesions effectively prevents neointima formation and recurrent restenosis at four months angiographic follow-up.

Background-Atherosclerosis

Objective: To evaluate the impact of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). Design: Prospective observational study. Patients: 78 patients who underwent both conventional and MSCT coronary angiography for suspicion of de novo coronary artery disease (n=53) or recurrent coronary artery disease after percutaneous intervention (n=25). Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Methods: Intravenously contrast enhanced MSCT coronary angiography was done during a single breath hold, and ECG synchronised images were reconstructed retrospectively. All coronary segments of > 2.0 mm without stents were evaluated by two investigators and compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to the average heart rate (mean (SD)) into three equally sized groups: group 1, 55.8 (4.1) beats/min; group 2, 66.6 (2.8) beats/min; group 3, 81.7 (8.8) beats/min. Results: Image quality was sufficient for analysis in 78% of the coronary segments in patients in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 54% in group 3 (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant stenoses (> 50% lumen reduction) in these assessable segments were: 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and 96% in group 1; 74% (52% to 89%) and 94% in group 2; and 67% (33% to 90%) and 94% in group 3 (p < 0.05). Accounting for all segments of > 2.0 mm, including lesions in non-assessable segments as false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 82% (28/34 lesions, 95% CI 69% to 91%), 61% (14/23 lesions, 42% to 77%), and 32% (6/19 lesions, 15% to 50%), respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: MSCT allows reliable coronary angiography in patients with low heart rates. C ontrast enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) is a promising non-invasive technique for the detection, visualisation, and characterisation of stenotic coronary artery disease. [1][2][3][4] However, MSCT has relatively poor temporal resolution compared with other methods of non-invasive coronary imaging such as electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging.5-7 Therefore MSCT remains sensitive to cardiac motion artefacts. 2 8We investigated the impact of average heart rate during acquisition of the MSCT angiograms on the accuracy of the technique for detecting stenotic coronary artery disease. METHODS PopulationMSCT angiography was undertaken in 78 patients (mean (SD) age 56.9 (10.1) years; 57 men, 21 women). They were suspected of having coronary artery disease (n = 53) or presented with recurrent symptoms after percutaneous coronary interventions (n = 25) (table 1). Exclusion criteria were: not being in sinus rhythm, having an allergy to iodine containing contrast media, renal failure (serum creatinine > 100 µmol/l), pregnancy, respiratory impairment, or pronounced cardiac failure.The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data acquisitionContrast enhanced MSCT examinations were done in the supine p...