Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been suggested to alter coronary flow reserve (CFR; the ratio between hyperemic and baseline coronary flow velocities) not only in territories supplied by stenotic arteries but also in angiographically normal, remote regions. However, few data exist regarding the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery as the normal index artery. The influence of remote CAD on CFR of the angiographically normal LAD was evaluated with transthoracic Doppler ultrasound to measure CFR in the LAD during 90 seconds of venous adenosine infusion (140 g/kg/min) in 122 subjects who were assigned to 1 group; group 1 comprised 49 controls without angiographically detectable CAD, and group 2 consisted of 73 patients with an angiographically normal LAD and remote CAD.
Experimental and clinical reports have suggested that acute myocardial infarction decreases coronary flow reserve (CFR; the ratio between hyperemic and baseline flow velocities) not only in the infarctrelated artery but also in remote, angiographically normal coronary arteries. 1-5 Discordant results have been reported in patients without previous myocardial infarction, 6 -8 and it is unclear what the interaction is when the normal vessel is the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Recent advances in color Doppler technology have allowed imaging of the distal LAD 9,10 by transthoracic echocardiography, thereby opening the way to the noninvasive detection of recanalization in acute anterior myocardial infarction, 11 diagnosis of LAD disease by measurement of CFR, 12-15 and monitoring of changes in CFR after stenting. 16,17 The aim of this study was to assess whether CFR in an angiographically normal LAD is preserved in patients with remote coronary artery disease (CAD), including those with myocardial infarction. CFR was prospectively measured by transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasound.
METHODSStudy population: Patients were selected from a population undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic cardiac catheterization at our institution. The requisite to be enrolled in this study was the presence of an angiographically normal LAD with or without remote CAD. From June 2002 to August 2003, 122 consecutive subjects (105 men and 17 women; mean age 58 Ϯ 10, range 31 to 77) were recruited and assigned to 1 of 2 groups; group 1 comprised 49 controls with chest pain but no angiographically detectable CAD (i.e., coronary arteries with angiographically smooth silhouettes), and group 2 consisted of 73 patients with an angiographically normal LAD and remote CAD. Group 2 was further divided into 4 subgroups: 16 patients with remote percutaneous coronary intervention but no evidence of myocardial infarction (group 2A); 13 patients without remote myocardial infarction but significant (Ն70%) remote coronary stenosis (group 2B); 23 patients with remote myocardial infarction and previous remote percutaneous coronary intervention (group 2C); and 21 patients with remote myocardial infarction but no remote percutaneous coronary intervention (group 2D)....