2017
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coronary microvascular reserve and outcome in aortic stenosis: Pathophysiological significance vs. clinical relevance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The fact that clinical symptoms occur at the end of the ischemic cascade (whereas perfusion abnormalities can be detected earlier) places great expectation on the physiological evaluation of AS. 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The fact that clinical symptoms occur at the end of the ischemic cascade (whereas perfusion abnormalities can be detected earlier) places great expectation on the physiological evaluation of AS. 7…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent years, it has been growingly acknowledged that AS encompasses a wide spectrum of pathways in response to the progressive obstruction of the left ventricular (LV) outflow. These include first adaptive responses such as LV concentric hypertrophy that relieves the wall stress in response to LV overload, then maladaptive responses such as myocardial ischemia and fibrosis that eventually lead to myocardial dysfunction and cardiac output failure ( 2 , 3 ). The concurrent progresses in computed tomography (CT), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) have given rise to imaging biomarkers allowing quantification of the structural remodeling of both the aortic valve and the underlying myocardium ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%