Coronary Sinus Activation Pattern in the Differential Diagnosis of Regular Atrial Tachyarrhythmias During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Kim, Ki Hun; Nam, Gi Byoung; Jin, Eun‐Sun; Kim, Dong Kie; Seol, Sang Hoon; Kim, Doo Il; Choi, Hyung Suk; Kim, Yoo Ri; Kim, Sung Hwan; Choi, Kee Joon; Kim, You Ho

doi:10.1253/circj.cj-12-0753

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5 In the present case, however, tachycardia was terminated by entrainment pacing, making differential diagnosis using this method not possible. Also, the nature of the tachycardia termination by entrainment pacing made reentry or triggered activity possible as the mechanism of AT.…”

Section: Images In Cardiovascular Medicine At Mimicking Aflmentioning

confidence: 61%

Sawtooth Electrocardiographic Pattern With Blocked Cavotricuspid Isthmus

Chen

Lin

et al. 2014

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Images In Cardiovascular Medicine At Mimicking Aflmentioning

confidence: 61%

Sawtooth Electrocardiographic Pattern With Blocked Cavotricuspid Isthmus

Chen

Lin

et al. 2014

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…It is well known that the majority of ATs originating from the LA are observed following atrial fibrillation ablation. [1][2][3][4][5] In the present case, a small reentrant AT was visualized in the aorta contiguity region. It was reported that the LA-aorta contiguity is responsible for the low voltage of the LAAW.…”

mentioning

confidence: 86%

Small Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Adjacent to Left Aortic Sinus of Valsalva

Maeda

Yamauchi

Tao

et al. 2013

Circ J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[ 43 ] Kim et al reported that a CS activation time <45 ms combined with entrainment pacing from the roof and posterior wall both help in the differentiation between roof-dependent ATs and perimitral and CTI-dependent ATs. [ 54 ] Casado Arroyo et al stated that a CS activation time ≤39 ms can assist in the diagnosis of roof-dependent ATs with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97%. [ 55 ]…”

Section: Mapping and Ablationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Atrial Tachycardias After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: How to Manage?

Hung

Chang

Wang

et al. 2020

Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With catheter ablation becoming effective for non-pharmacological management of AF, many cases of atrial tachycardia (AT) after AF ablation have been reported in the past decade. These arrhythmias are often symptomatic and respond poorly to medical therapy. Post-AF-ablation ATs can be classified into the following three categories: focal, macroreentrant and microreentrant ATs. Mapping these ATs is challenging because of atrial remodelling and its complex mechanisms, such as double ATs and multiple-loop ATs. High-density mapping can achieve precise identification of the circuits and critical isthmuses of ATs and improve the efficacy of catheter ablation. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanisms, mapping and ablation strategy, and outcome of ATs after AF ablation.

show abstract

Coronary Sinus Activation Pattern in the Differential Diagnosis of Regular Atrial Tachyarrhythmias During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

Sawtooth Electrocardiographic Pattern With Blocked Cavotricuspid Isthmus

Sawtooth Electrocardiographic Pattern With Blocked Cavotricuspid Isthmus

Small Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Adjacent to Left Aortic Sinus of Valsalva

Atrial Tachycardias After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: How to Manage?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About