2015
DOI: 10.1075/scl.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corpora, Grammar and Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a network for a particular construction, they compute a measure called betweenness centrality, which indicates the centrality of each verb's meaning in this construction. This way, the most general verbs in the construction (in this case, go and move) tend to obtain higher prototypicality values (see Gries & Ellis, 2015;Römer et al, 2015, for more detail). In this sense, "semantic generality" would be a more suitable term; however, we follow EOR and other studies mentioned next in using the word "prototypicality".…”
Section: Semantic Prototypicalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a network for a particular construction, they compute a measure called betweenness centrality, which indicates the centrality of each verb's meaning in this construction. This way, the most general verbs in the construction (in this case, go and move) tend to obtain higher prototypicality values (see Gries & Ellis, 2015;Römer et al, 2015, for more detail). In this sense, "semantic generality" would be a more suitable term; however, we follow EOR and other studies mentioned next in using the word "prototypicality".…”
Section: Semantic Prototypicalitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that EOR's stimuli have a very weak semantic component: they are, in fact, form-based patterns, and participants are free in their interpretations of the arguments' thematic roles. Römer, O'Donnell, and Ellis (2015) motivate such an approach by the fact that they analyse semantic associations between verbs and constructions, and therefore it is "important to initially define the forms that will be analysed in a semantics-free, bottom-up manner" (p. 45). Although this is a controversial point (and we return to it in the discussion), in this study we follow their approach.…”
Section: Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%