Corporate foundations and their governance

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the governance structures of corporate foundations in the implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Design/methodology/approach – After discussing the heretofore-underutilized research advantages of corporate foundations, the authors survey theoretical perspectives to explain the corporate foundation phenomenon. The authors build on this theory to construct a typology of corporate foundation structures based on their interactions with internal and external stakeholders. Findings – The findings suggest that many of the largest corporations do not embed their corporate foundation into their strategic plan as they define it (i.e. specific alignment with corporate competency). Research limitations/implications – Research limitations include an examination solely of the 50 largest corporate foundations among a field of nearly 3,000 corporate foundations. The authors advance a research agenda that addresses the potential role of corporate foundations in fulfilling CSR. Practical implications – The foundation field may see a movement toward corporate foundations being strategically aligned with the parent company’s core competence as external stakeholders continue to pressure companies. Social implications – Studying corporate foundations is important as they serve as intermediaries between corporations and civil society. Thus, they will continue to play an important role in the CSR agenda. Originality/value – This paper is one of the first to examine the corporate foundation phenomenon, with a specific focus on their governance. Thus, the authors go beyond the motivations that lead corporations to be involved in “socially responsible activities,” the types of activities that corporations select, and how these choices produce benefits for a diverse set of stakeholders.

The role of trade narratives in poverty reduction after the COVID-19 crisis

“…Narratives drive behaviors of members of the general public, political leaders and owners and managers of private sector firms. Narratives influencing the actions of the leaders of many firms is the expectation a firm has the responsibility to make an effort to improve society through what is often labelled as corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities (Minefee et al, 2015). While the term CSR is often used in a very abstract manner, Korontzis (2013, p. 301) claimed the term CSR was normally used to refer to voluntarily engaging in activities which will benefit various stakeholders and society in general even if the activities are not intended to maximize profits.…”

Dual effects of corporate philanthropy on firm value: Evidence from China

“…The increasing enthusiasm of firms to engage in public welfare and charity has urged more and more firms to establish corporate foundations to specialize in charity. Corporate foundations are charitable organizations usually created and financed by firms via corporate donations (Monfort et al, 2021), which implements the social and philanthropic dimensions of CSR (Herlin & Pedersen, 2013; Minefee et al, 2015), and are increasingly visible in the philanthropic landscape of charitable foundations and CP activities (Gehringer, 2021).…”

Corporate Hypocrisy: Role of Non-Profit Corporate Foundations in Earnings Management of For-Profit Founder Firms

“…More specifically, as an innovative form of social organization, corporate foundations are a novelty in China where they are almost non-existent until 2005. However, corporate foundations in the U.S. are largely thought of as a twentieth-century phenomenon [28]. In addition, the U.S. has the most advanced governance rules for charitable foundations especially for corporate foundations.…”