2007
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.62.9.1005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate funding and conflicts of interest: A primer for psychologists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In social work we have recently observed protest regarding NASW's involvement with the pharmaceutical industry (Cohen et al, 2006). In contrast, in psychology, the president of APA (Philip Zimbardo) created a task force on external funding to review APA policies, procedures, and practices regarding the acceptance of funding and material support from private corporations and other organizations for educational and training programs; continuing education offerings; research projects; publications; advertising; scientific and professional meetings, and conferences; and consulting, practice, and advocacy relationships; and recommend such changes and policies as are deemed necessary to enhance and protect the integrity and ethical standards of psychology (Pachter, Fox, Zimbardo, & Antonuccio, 2007).…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In social work we have recently observed protest regarding NASW's involvement with the pharmaceutical industry (Cohen et al, 2006). In contrast, in psychology, the president of APA (Philip Zimbardo) created a task force on external funding to review APA policies, procedures, and practices regarding the acceptance of funding and material support from private corporations and other organizations for educational and training programs; continuing education offerings; research projects; publications; advertising; scientific and professional meetings, and conferences; and consulting, practice, and advocacy relationships; and recommend such changes and policies as are deemed necessary to enhance and protect the integrity and ethical standards of psychology (Pachter, Fox, Zimbardo, & Antonuccio, 2007).…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students were similarly positive about the explicit RCR knowledge communicated to them through mentoring and the implicit endorsement of RCR values conveyed though mentor behaviors. Responses on measures of RCR departmental climate, mentoring, and preparedness converged to highlight how to recognize and avoid conflicts of interest in research as an area that needs increased attention in psychology graduate programs (Pachter, Fox, Zimbardo & Antonuccio, 2007). Of some concern is that one out of every 10 students had subscale scores suggesting that some departments are too lax in their support for and monitoring of student and faculty ethics related research endeavors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it appears from the responses of our national sample that students with relatively high interest in research are crying out for more direct supervision in how to responsibly conduct their own research and what is expected of them as research assistants. Second, as psychological science becomes increasingly attractive to corporate funders, graduate students, and perhaps departmental faculty as well, will need specific guidance in how to recognize and avoid research conflicts of interest (Fisher, 2009; Pachter et al, 2007). Third, our findings empirically support what is perhaps intuitive about RCR principles; that is, research ethics values of the discipline of psychology are not transmitted to students simply by taking a course in ethics or having experience submitting IRB proposals, but require explicit direction from mentors and clear departmental policies that provide students with the resources to feel prepared to independently conduct research responsibly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One story concerned a senior researcher at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) who accepted unauthorized fees from 25 pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in addition to government sponsored research in-volving drugs. A second example was that of a senior scientist, a head of the geriatric psychiatry at the NIH, who admitted that he failed to disclose $285,000 in fees from a pharmaceutical company 4 .…”
Section: Conflict Of Interests and Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%