2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.787346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance and IT Governance: Exploring the Board's Perspective

Abstract: Information technology (IT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the current literature in information systems indicates that the evolution of IT governance is based primarily on the principles and guidelines of corporate governance (Heart, Maoz, & Pliskin, 2010;ITGI, 2003;Jordan & Musson, 2004;Korac-Kakabadse & Kakabadse, 2001;Mähring, 2006;Raghupathi, 2007;Weill & Ross, 2004). Larcker, Richardson, and Tuna (2007, p. 964) refer to "corporate governance as the set of mechanisms that influence the decisions made by managers when there is a separation of ownership and control."…”
Section: Corporate Governance and It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the current literature in information systems indicates that the evolution of IT governance is based primarily on the principles and guidelines of corporate governance (Heart, Maoz, & Pliskin, 2010;ITGI, 2003;Jordan & Musson, 2004;Korac-Kakabadse & Kakabadse, 2001;Mähring, 2006;Raghupathi, 2007;Weill & Ross, 2004). Larcker, Richardson, and Tuna (2007, p. 964) refer to "corporate governance as the set of mechanisms that influence the decisions made by managers when there is a separation of ownership and control."…”
Section: Corporate Governance and It Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges facing applying the Balanced Scorecard: the most evident challenges facing the application of the Balanced Scorecard as seen by (Jordan, E. & Musson, 2004) are, Firstly: management and employees' Lack of commitment in the process of applying the Balanced Scorecard. Secondly, no commitment in applying the short-term operational plans and annual budgets by the right time, thirdly, the limitations imposed on the information system meaning the inability of measuring the performance fully, and fourthly, differences among the members of the team in drawing the strategic map and choosing the performance measures, and lastly, Permanent resistance by many parties for managing change.…”
Section: D-initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of COBIT is that accountability of the IT systems is achieved by the use of a set of audit control processes [18]. The framework provides a definition of IT governance consisting of four domains and 34 processes.…”
Section: Review Of Major It Governance Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%