2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jefas.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate governance characteristics and valuation: Inferences from quantile regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A model that has been proposed as an effective alternative to the two flawed techniques is quantile regression model (Rousseliere, 2014;Shawtari, Salem, Hussain, Alaeddin and Thabit, 2016). As the dependent variable takes the ranges between upper and lower values (0, 1), it results in having a number of percentiles of dependent variable, in which its relationship with corporate governance varies from one percentile to another.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A model that has been proposed as an effective alternative to the two flawed techniques is quantile regression model (Rousseliere, 2014;Shawtari, Salem, Hussain, Alaeddin and Thabit, 2016). As the dependent variable takes the ranges between upper and lower values (0, 1), it results in having a number of percentiles of dependent variable, in which its relationship with corporate governance varies from one percentile to another.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, estimating the relationship based on the averaged figures or means may not reflect the reality and would hide some information due to heterogeneity of the data (Chi, Huang, and Xie, 2015). Consequently, it is believed that using the quantile regression would provide a better estimation for the relationship between dependent and independent variables as the analysis estimate the relationship at any point conditional on the distribution of the dependent variable (Shawtari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La función de la GC es proteger los intereses de los stakeholders y, por tanto, conforme se evidencia en otras investigaciones, la misma tiene el foco centrado en el Consejo de Administración (Adams, Hermalin & Weisbach, 2010;Gaa, 2009;García-Torea, Fernández-Feijoo & De La Cuesta, 2016;Lanis & Richardson, 2011;Ness, Miesing & Kang, 2010); en los ejecutivos y sus compensaciones (Hong, Li & Minor, 2016;Lozano, Martínez & Pindado, 2016); en el control de las corporaciones y en la estructura de propiedad (Abdallah & Ismail, 2017;Ararat, Black & Yurtoglu, 2017;Ducassy & Guyot, 2017); así como se centra en las políticas económicas de las corporaciones (Akbar, et al, 2016;Briano-Turrent & Rodríguez-Ariza, 2016;Shawtari, et al, 2016;Villanueva-Villar, Rivo-López & Lago-Peñas, 2016).…”
Section: Gobernanza Corporativaunclassified
“…The third view on maturity structures is derived from the liquidity needs of firms where managers are seen to be balancing the need for liquidity which is obtained via long-term borrowing versus improvement in credit ratings as a result of borrowing in the short-term (Brick and Liao, 2017;Shawtari et al, 2016;Al Shubri and Jamil, 2017;Kamarudin et al, 2018). Finally, the signalling theory predicts that managers are further balancing the benefit arising positive signal sent to the market by borrowing in the short terms versus the higher costs associated with frequent need to renew debt contracts (Iqbal- Hussain and Guney, 2011;Khaw and Lee, 2016;Pontoh, 2017;.…”
Section: Motivating the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%