2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3312515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Governance, Employment, and Financial Performance of Japanese Firms: A Cross-Country Analysis

Abstract: This study examines whether the sustained lower profitability and market valuation of Japanese firms compared to global peer firms can be explained by the structure of insider dominate board of directors and the employment system which hinders flexible employment adjustments by using crosscountry data. Firstly we show that level of outside director ratio and flexibility of employment adjustment both differ consistently across 27 countries in the analyzed period. We show that these two factors significantly exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This refers to Bauer et al (2008), where shareholders and stakeholders prefer BOD independence in Japan because it has a great commitment and focuses on the value of the company in the long term -not the short term so that BOD independence is usually hired until they retire. Moreover, independent BOD from outside the company is considered more idealistic and more objective, so risk-taking is more likely to be carried out by Arikawa et al (2017). If it is concluded from a performance comparison, insider BOD was only able to record an increase in ROA of 0.6%, while BOD independence was able to change significantly, namely 29%.…”
Section: Bod Independence and Financial Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This refers to Bauer et al (2008), where shareholders and stakeholders prefer BOD independence in Japan because it has a great commitment and focuses on the value of the company in the long term -not the short term so that BOD independence is usually hired until they retire. Moreover, independent BOD from outside the company is considered more idealistic and more objective, so risk-taking is more likely to be carried out by Arikawa et al (2017). If it is concluded from a performance comparison, insider BOD was only able to record an increase in ROA of 0.6%, while BOD independence was able to change significantly, namely 29%.…”
Section: Bod Independence and Financial Performancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to the regulation from the IDX, namely Kep-305/BEJ/07-2004, which regulates the existence of BOD independence until 2019 but has been abolished since 2019 through regulation Kep-00183/BEI/12-2018. Considering that BOD independence comes from outsiders, the significance notes are idealistic, and objective (Arikawa et al, 2017) have a great commitment and focus on the value of the company in the long term -not the short term so that BOD independence in Japan is usually hired until they retire (Bauer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%