1993
DOI: 10.4135/9781483325637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Political Agency: The Construction of Competition in Public Affairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In concluding, it is worth echoing the calls of Epstein (1980), Mitnick (1993) and Vogel (1996) for greater systematic efforts in analyzing the business-government interface.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In concluding, it is worth echoing the calls of Epstein (1980), Mitnick (1993) and Vogel (1996) for greater systematic efforts in analyzing the business-government interface.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a number of management scholars (Epstein, 1980;Mitnick, 1993;Vogel, 1996) have expressed concern regarding the lack of rigor in the CPS literature. The supporting role of the IO and IPE literatures in this analysis yields a systematic approach that enhances analytical-rigor.…”
Section: "Admitting He Was Not Too Old To Be Surprised Jack Welch Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vast literature demonstrates the impact of business interest groups on policy making (Schattschneider 1935;Olson 1965;Mitnick 1993). In addition, companies use many different methods of political influence, including political donations, public relations and expert advice, which can yield them many business benefits including corporate influence over government policies, better information and reduced uncertainty (Keim and Zeithaml 1986;Getz 1993;Hillman and Hitt 1999).…”
Section: Undermining Governance Through Corporate Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…how to reduce transitional cost). Agency theory examines the relations in which one party (agent) acts for another (principal), deals with problems derived from agent-principal relationships, and employs strategies the principal to reduce the problems (Eisenhardt, 1989;Keim & Baysinger, 1993;Mitnick, 1993). Agency theory in business public affairs focuses on the agency relationship -the firm as principal and the political decision-maker as agent-and treats the relationship as the product of business political activity.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency theory in business public affairs focuses on the agency relationship -the firm as principal and the political decision-maker as agent-and treats the relationship as the product of business political activity. Since it is structurally impossible for corporations to make policy decisions, the motivation of having political action is to create agents who act on their behalf and further, to maintain a good agency relationship (Mitnick, 1993).…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%