2018
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2018.1469159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: a study among indian business executives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
96
1
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
96
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is an effort to figure out the association of CSR with EE and performance through social identity theory (SIT). Based on past studies of CSR and employee behavior (Chaudhary, 2018; Zhang, Di Fan, & Zhu, 2014), scholars claim that CSR practices develop employee behavior through organizational identification as an employee feel proud to be a part of such value‐driven organizations.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study is an effort to figure out the association of CSR with EE and performance through social identity theory (SIT). Based on past studies of CSR and employee behavior (Chaudhary, 2018; Zhang, Di Fan, & Zhu, 2014), scholars claim that CSR practices develop employee behavior through organizational identification as an employee feel proud to be a part of such value‐driven organizations.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be distinguished and honored, individuals try to identify themselves with a social group that possesses unique characteristics, values, and a positive reputation (Chaudhary, 2018). So, individuals aim to identify themselves with a socially responsible and well‐reputed organization as members of such organizations may fulfill their psychological needs of uniqueness (Turker, 2009) and keep them in a positive light (Turker, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ancak son yıllarda sosyal sorumluluk alanındaki çalışmalar ağırlıklı olarak, işgörenlerin kendilerine ve diğer paydaşlara yönelik sosyal sorumluluk faaliyetlerine nasıl tepki verdiklerini açıklamayı amaçlayan mikro veya bireysel düzey bakış açısı ile ele alınmakta ve sosyal sorumluluk olgusu daha dinamik bir çalışma alanı haline dönüşmektedir (Morgeson vd., 2013;Mallory, 2015, De Roeck, El Akremi ve Swaen, 2016;De Roeck ve Maon, 2018). Örneğin; çalışanların sosyal sorumluluk algılarının; örgütsel bağlılık (Farooq vd., 2014;Hofman ve Newman, 2014;Kim, Song ve Lee, 2016;Bouraoi vd., 2018), iş tatmini (Closon, Leys ve Hellemans, 2015;Asrar-ul Haq, Kuchinke ve Iqbal, 2017;Boğan, Türkay ve Dedeoğlu, 2018), örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı (Newman, Nielsen ve Miao, 2015;Gao ve He, 2017;Rashid, Gul ve Khalid, 2018), işgören performansı (Newman, Nielsen ve Miao, 2015;Gupta ve Sharma, 2016;Chaudhary, 2018) ve işe tutkunluk (Gao, Zhang ve Huo, 2018;Rupp vd., 2018;Besieux vd., 2018) gibi tutumsal ve davranışsal tepkiler ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğunu ortaya koyan çok sayıda güncel çalışma mevcuttur.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified