2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11020481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Social Responsibility, the Atmospheric Environment, and Technological Innovation Investment

Abstract: Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper takes the 2016 data of China's A-share listed enterprises as a sample. It then uses SPSS 22 to conduct statistical analyses on the sample data to study the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and technological innovation investment, particularly the role of the atmospheric environment in regulating the relationship between the two. This paper shows that there is a significant positive correlation between CSR and an enterprise's technological in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies emphasize that when CSR is included in a corporate strategy, it tends to enhance technological innovation investment [49,50]. However, the reverse direction of how innovation imposes on a firm's decision to take part in CSR is hardly examined [51].…”
Section: Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies emphasize that when CSR is included in a corporate strategy, it tends to enhance technological innovation investment [49,50]. However, the reverse direction of how innovation imposes on a firm's decision to take part in CSR is hardly examined [51].…”
Section: Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, research is lacking on the validity of measuring CSR performance and disclosure quality, as well as the convergent validity between these scores. In this paper, a comparative and quantitative analysis was performed for the period 2010-2017, and the following results were obtained: (1) Based on a comparison of the rating methods, information sources, and other factors, RKS is more suitable for measuring the CSR disclosure quality, while Hexun is more suitable for measuring the CSR performance; (2) based on a Spearman correlation analysis, the convergent validity between these two scores is very low, particularly after 2013; and (3) the sub-indicator weights of the RKS system always maintain a high stability, whereas those of the Hexun system suffer from severe fluctuations starting in 2013.Sustainability 2019, 11, 3921 2 of 20 mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21][22][23], the drivers of CSR performance [24][25][26][27][28][29], and economic consequences [30][31][32][33][34][35]; and (2) the HX score is used only as a proxy for the CSR performance level, such as in research on the drivers of CSR performance [36][37][38][39][40] and the economic consequences of CSR performance [19,33,[41][42][43]. Some studies even use the level-1 sub-indicator of the HX score, the environmental dimension HXE, to score a firm's environmental performance level [44,45].Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 also for CSR performance levels, such as in research on the drivers of CSR disclosure quality [16][17][18][19], the mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 21 also for CSR performance levels, such as in research on the drivers of CSR disclosure quality [16][17][18][19], the mechanisms of economic consequences [20][21][22][23], the drivers of CSR performance [24][25][26][27][28][29], and economic consequences [30][31][32][33][34][35]; and (2) the HX score is used only as a proxy for the CSR performance level, such as in research on the drivers of CSR performance [36][37][38][39][40] and the economic consequences of CSR performance [19,33,[41][42][43]. Some studies even use the level-1 sub-indicator of the HX score, the environmental dimension HXE, to score a firm's environmental performance level [44,45].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51-119). On a macroeconomic scale, competitiveness is conditioned by both the actions of institutions at the central level, decisions taken by the legislative and executive authorities, as well as the potential of entrepreneurship, which is diversified depending on the level of socio-economic development of society (Zhou et al, 2019). In turn, the economic, legal and administrative environment created by the state has a significant influence on the possibilities and way of conducting economic activity, because this environment shapes the external factors of the enterprises competitiveness (Cerne et al, 2015, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%