Dynamic Learning Networks 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0251-1_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corporate Universities 2.0: The Future Networked Learning Organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 4,000 CU in the United States as of 2010, double the number since the 1990s (McAteer & Pino, 2011). In the literature, it is found that CUs can be assessed in 10 fields for performance (Meister, 2006;Meister, 2009;Wheeler and Cleg, 2005). This would mean that, they can be structured and evaluated by those 10 dimension.…”
Section: Structuring Of Corporate Universities As the Mechanisms For mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 4,000 CU in the United States as of 2010, double the number since the 1990s (McAteer & Pino, 2011). In the literature, it is found that CUs can be assessed in 10 fields for performance (Meister, 2006;Meister, 2009;Wheeler and Cleg, 2005). This would mean that, they can be structured and evaluated by those 10 dimension.…”
Section: Structuring Of Corporate Universities As the Mechanisms For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılan bilimsel araştırmalarda başarılı kurumsal akademilerin 10 farklı başlık altında performanslarının farklılaşabileceği görülmektedir (Meister, 2006;Meister, 2009;Wheeler ve Cleg, 2005). Bu 10 alan şu şekilde özetlenebilir: yönetim yapısı, vizyon, kapsam, finansal işleyiş, ihtiyaç belirleme süreçleri, ürün ve hizmet geliştirme, işbirliği süreçleri, teknoloji altyapısı, ölçme ve değerlendirme sistemleri ile iletişim ve markalaşma.…”
Section: Structuring Of Corporate Universities As the Mechanisms For Developing The Efficiency Of Training At Organizationsunclassified
“…More recently, a university 2.0 has been defined as a research and entrepreneurial university which integrates web 2.0 technologies and applications in all university activities, including ones with all knowledge intensive stakeholders, and implements the features of the enterprise 2.0 (Nikolov, 2009). As parallel, corporate university 2.0 has been defined as a corporate learning initiative using web 2.0 social media tools such as blogs, wikis, podcasts, online forums and video sharing sites to seamlessly blend learning and working (Meister, 2009).…”
Section: The Stakeholder Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the ultimate purpose of human capital development evolves from developing specific competencies to creating value for a network of stakeholders. The company of the twenty-first century should be able to link dispersed knowledge, initiative and The stakeholder university expertise and to sustain improved communication, integration, collaboration and closer interaction and partnering with customers, suppliers and a wider range of stakeholders (Allen, 2009;Meister, 2009). The transforming "dimensions" of human capital development are evident in the evolution of corporate learning models, which can be framed in three different phases:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%