2011
DOI: 10.1021/je1011086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrected Values for Boiling Points and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Elements in Handbooks

Abstract: The scientific community relies upon the veracity of the scientific data in handbooks and databases. In a previous work, the authors developed a systematic, intelligent, and potentially automatic method to detect errors in such resources based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). This method revealed variations from (10 to 900) % in tables of property data for elements in the periodic table and pointed out the ones that are most probably correct. In this paper, we focus on the details of employing this method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From four discussed systems, only AlÀBi(OH) 3 system has hydroxide metal (Bi) boiling temperature (1833 K) significantly below the adiabatic combustion temperature (3001 K). All other examined systems have the hydroxide metal boiling temperature [19] above adiabatic combustion temperature. As a result, the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 system AlÀBi(OH) 3 demonstrates much higher pressure discharge value (5.6 kPa m À3 ) then the other 3 systems (0.01-0.16 kPa m À3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From four discussed systems, only AlÀBi(OH) 3 system has hydroxide metal (Bi) boiling temperature (1833 K) significantly below the adiabatic combustion temperature (3001 K). All other examined systems have the hydroxide metal boiling temperature [19] above adiabatic combustion temperature. As a result, the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 system AlÀBi(OH) 3 demonstrates much higher pressure discharge value (5.6 kPa m À3 ) then the other 3 systems (0.01-0.16 kPa m À3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According Table 2. Boiling point of metal [19], normalized pressure and heat generation for the systems AlÀBi(OH) 3 , AlÀCu(OH) 2 , AlÀNi(OH) 2 and AlÀCe(OH) 4 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 to the thermodynamic calculations, four systems based on bismuth, copper, cerium, and nickel hydroxides were prepared and tested for energy release and pressure discharge values, which demonstrate the reliability of calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ascending order, these enthalpies (in kJ/mole) are: 32 (As), 68 (Sb), 227 (In), and 255 (Ga). 24 By considering the anion (As, Sb) sub-lattice, one can say that it is easier to remove the deposited As atoms from their sites than Sb atoms, which explains the observed As substitutions by Sb. In the cation sub-lattice, it is easier to remove the deposited In atoms, than Ga atoms, which makes In replacements by Ga more effective.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we conservatively take the latent heat of vaporisation appropriate for iron, Lvap 6 kJ g −1 (Zhang et al 2011).…”
Section: Gmpmentioning
confidence: 99%