2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correcting for the influence of frozen lakes in satellite microwave radiometer observations through application of a microwave emission model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the subarctic (Figure ), there is greater disagreement between SSM/I and simulated T B at 19 GHz due to the high lake fraction in this region, a source of positive bias in HUT simulations identified in previous studies [ Derksen et al ., ; Gunn et al ., ; Lemmetyinen et al ., ]. At 37 GHz (where lake ice fraction also introduces some additional uncertainty), the results are similar as at the high Arctic site: the range in simulated T B from the HUT simulations with varying stratigraphic inputs extends far below the SSM/I measured brightness temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the subarctic (Figure ), there is greater disagreement between SSM/I and simulated T B at 19 GHz due to the high lake fraction in this region, a source of positive bias in HUT simulations identified in previous studies [ Derksen et al ., ; Gunn et al ., ; Lemmetyinen et al ., ]. At 37 GHz (where lake ice fraction also introduces some additional uncertainty), the results are similar as at the high Arctic site: the range in simulated T B from the HUT simulations with varying stratigraphic inputs extends far below the SSM/I measured brightness temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Water bodies strongly affect microwave emission of the ground, which is known to lead to underestimation of SWE in passive microwave-based retrievals (Rees et al, 2006;Lemmetyinen et al, 2011). For the abovementioned N Canada data set, water bodies might explain the significant bias of 36 mm , but the average values (120 mm) are also sufficiently high that saturation effects (Luojus et al, 2010) are likely to contribute to the bias.…”
Section: Snowmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The largest impact on SWE retrievals is most likely during lake freezing and snow cover buildup in fall, when GlobSnow SWE retrievals must be considered highly uncertain. In the future, enhanced SWE retrieval algorithms taking the effect of water bodies explicitly into account (e.g., Lemmetyinen et al, 2011) may become available.…”
Section: Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave emissions from a non-scattering atmosphere are governed by both air temperature and atmosphere optical thickness, which is approximately the sum of the optical thickness of oxygen, cloud liquid water, and atmospheric water vapor (Wang and Tedesco, 2007;Du et al, 2015). Microwave emissions from a lake with an upper layer that may consist of water, ice, and snow are determined by a number of factors; these factors include lake surface roughness, water dielectric properties mainly affected by water salinity and temperature, ice thickness and dielectric properties, and snow cover dielectric properties mainly controlled by snow density and wetness, snow particle size, and stratification of snow and ice layers (Du et al, 2010;Lemmetyinen et al, 2010Lemmetyinen et al, , 2011. Despite the complexity of the lake emission problem, sharp changes in satellite microwave T b observations at multiple frequencies are evident during the transitions between lake freeze-up and breakup periods.…”
Section: Algorithm Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%